The Final Examination of the UK PhD: Fit for Purpose?
Saved in:
| Title: | The Final Examination of the UK PhD: Fit for Purpose? |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Gillian Houston (ORCID |
| Source: | Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2024 49(8):1182-1195. |
| Availability: | Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 14 |
| Publication Date: | 2024 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Foreign Countries, Doctoral Degrees, Doctoral Dissertations, Degree Requirements, Research Committees, Research Training, Graduate Students, College Faculty, Faculty Advisers, Examiners, Test Validity, Career Readiness |
| Geographic Terms: | United Kingdom |
| DOI: | 10.1080/02602938.2024.2364026 |
| ISSN: | 0260-2938 1469-297X |
| Abstract: | In recent decades the doctorate and its purposes have undergone fundamental change. The scholarly model has evolved from one of 'apprentice' to independent, supported learner and the doctoral training process has been revolutionised; many candidates now experience cohort-based, structured research. The UK's final PhD examination, however, has changed little in response and as a result has been called into question: does the current model -- thesis evaluation followed by a viva voce examination -- adequately assess the candidate, their achievements and their potential? This article includes data from a larger study that included live observations of viva examinations and interviews with candidates, supervisors and examiners. In the article, we explore the developments that have transformed the UK PhD from an elite 'licence to practise' for a minority to a mainstream qualification increasingly used to enhance career prospects. We consider the fitness for purpose of the examination by analysing the attributes assessed through the thesis and the viva. The article concludes by questioning whether the examination process enables examiners to communicate the attributes on which judgements are based: the candidate's ability to conduct research independently, their professional and personal characteristics, and their potential career prospects. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2024 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1451214 |
| Database: | ERIC |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | In recent decades the doctorate and its purposes have undergone fundamental change. The scholarly model has evolved from one of 'apprentice' to independent, supported learner and the doctoral training process has been revolutionised; many candidates now experience cohort-based, structured research. The UK's final PhD examination, however, has changed little in response and as a result has been called into question: does the current model -- thesis evaluation followed by a viva voce examination -- adequately assess the candidate, their achievements and their potential? This article includes data from a larger study that included live observations of viva examinations and interviews with candidates, supervisors and examiners. In the article, we explore the developments that have transformed the UK PhD from an elite 'licence to practise' for a minority to a mainstream qualification increasingly used to enhance career prospects. We consider the fitness for purpose of the examination by analysing the attributes assessed through the thesis and the viva. The article concludes by questioning whether the examination process enables examiners to communicate the attributes on which judgements are based: the candidate's ability to conduct research independently, their professional and personal characteristics, and their potential career prospects. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0260-2938 1469-297X |
| DOI: | 10.1080/02602938.2024.2364026 |
