Toward Asset-Based Instruction and Assessment in Artificial Intelligence in Education

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Toward Asset-Based Instruction and Assessment in Artificial Intelligence in Education
Language: English
Authors: Jaclyn Ocumpaugh (ORCID 0000-0002-9667-8523), Rod D. Roscoe (ORCID 0000-0001-8327-4012), Ryan S. Baker (ORCID 0000-0002-3051-3232), Stephen Hutt (ORCID 0000-0002-7041-7472), Stephen J. Aguilar (ORCID 0000-0003-2606-067X)
Source: International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 2024 34(4):1559-1598.
Availability: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 40
Publication Date: 2024
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Descriptive
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Educational Technology, Technology Uses in Education, Individualized Instruction, At Risk Students, Student Characteristics, Academic Ability, Educational Research
DOI: 10.1007/s40593-023-00382-x
ISSN: 1560-4292
1560-4306
Abstract: The artificial intelligence in education (AIED) community has produced technologies that are widely used to support learning, teaching, assessment, and administration. This work has successfully enhanced test scores, course grades, skill acquisition, comprehension, engagement, and related outcomes. However, the prevailing approach to adaptive and personalized learning has two main steps. First, the process involves detecting the areas of knowledge and competencies where students are deficient. This process also identifies when or how a student is considered "at risk" or in some way "lacking." Second, the approach involves providing timely, individualized assistance to address these deficiencies. However, a considerable body of research outside our field has established that such "deficit" framing, by itself, leads to reactive and less productive strategies. In deficit-based frameworks, powerful student strengths, skills, and schemas--their assets--are not explicitly leveraged. In this paper, we outline an asset-based paradigm for AIED research and development, proposing principles for our community to build upon learners' rich funds of knowledge. We propose that embracing asset-based approaches will empower the AIED community (e.g., educators, developers, and researchers) to reach broader populations of learners. We discuss the potentially transformative role this approach could play in supporting learning and personal development for all learners, particularly for students who are historically underserved, marginalized, and "deficit-ized."
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2024
Accession Number: EJ1453648
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:The artificial intelligence in education (AIED) community has produced technologies that are widely used to support learning, teaching, assessment, and administration. This work has successfully enhanced test scores, course grades, skill acquisition, comprehension, engagement, and related outcomes. However, the prevailing approach to adaptive and personalized learning has two main steps. First, the process involves detecting the areas of knowledge and competencies where students are deficient. This process also identifies when or how a student is considered "at risk" or in some way "lacking." Second, the approach involves providing timely, individualized assistance to address these deficiencies. However, a considerable body of research outside our field has established that such "deficit" framing, by itself, leads to reactive and less productive strategies. In deficit-based frameworks, powerful student strengths, skills, and schemas--their assets--are not explicitly leveraged. In this paper, we outline an asset-based paradigm for AIED research and development, proposing principles for our community to build upon learners' rich funds of knowledge. We propose that embracing asset-based approaches will empower the AIED community (e.g., educators, developers, and researchers) to reach broader populations of learners. We discuss the potentially transformative role this approach could play in supporting learning and personal development for all learners, particularly for students who are historically underserved, marginalized, and "deficit-ized."
ISSN:1560-4292
1560-4306
DOI:10.1007/s40593-023-00382-x