The Impact of Non-Labeled Response Categories of Rating Scales: An Example with Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Two Self-Regulation Scales for Exercise

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The Impact of Non-Labeled Response Categories of Rating Scales: An Example with Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Two Self-Regulation Scales for Exercise
Language: English
Authors: Marcela Alves Sanseverino, Ana Carolina Raabe Abitante, Monique Cristielle Silva da Silva, Liza S. Rovniak, Wagner de Lara Machado
Source: Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science. 2025 29(1):1-10.
Availability: Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 10
Publication Date: 2025
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Rating Scales, Self Management, Exercise, Test Validity, Test Reliability, Translation, Psychometrics, Likert Scales, Classification, Foreign Countries, Portuguese, Measures (Individuals), Goal Orientation, Physical Activities, Adults
Geographic Terms: Brazil
DOI: 10.1080/1091367X.2024.2378875
ISSN: 1091-367X
1532-7841
Abstract: As part of a validation study of the Exercise Planning and Scheduling (EPS), and Goal-Setting (EGS) Scales, which were translated from English to Brazilian Portuguese, we aim to: present evidence of reliability and validity for the translated scale; and, explore the effects of non-labeled response categories of rating scales. The sample comprised 446 Brazilians, 82.5% female with a mean age of 32.89 (±12.21) years. The McDonald's [omega] was 0.883 and 0.899 for EPS and EGS, respectively. Descriptive data and the Rasch Models confirmed that participants tended to endorse labeled categories on 5-point Likert-type scales. The model tested with the revised response scale presented better fit indices and lower values of residual statistics than the original one. These findings contribute psychometric evidence on a translated scale that could be used in future health promotion initiatives, and suggest a psychometric characteristic -- response category labeling -- that warrants future attention in measurement development.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2025
Accession Number: EJ1459068
Database: ERIC
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:As part of a validation study of the Exercise Planning and Scheduling (EPS), and Goal-Setting (EGS) Scales, which were translated from English to Brazilian Portuguese, we aim to: present evidence of reliability and validity for the translated scale; and, explore the effects of non-labeled response categories of rating scales. The sample comprised 446 Brazilians, 82.5% female with a mean age of 32.89 (±12.21) years. The McDonald's [omega] was 0.883 and 0.899 for EPS and EGS, respectively. Descriptive data and the Rasch Models confirmed that participants tended to endorse labeled categories on 5-point Likert-type scales. The model tested with the revised response scale presented better fit indices and lower values of residual statistics than the original one. These findings contribute psychometric evidence on a translated scale that could be used in future health promotion initiatives, and suggest a psychometric characteristic -- response category labeling -- that warrants future attention in measurement development.
ISSN:1091-367X
1532-7841
DOI:10.1080/1091367X.2024.2378875