Exploring Math Moments: Middle-Schoolers' Phases of Problem-Solving, Executive Functions in Practice, and Collaborative Problem Solving
Saved in:
| Title: | Exploring Math Moments: Middle-Schoolers' Phases of Problem-Solving, Executive Functions in Practice, and Collaborative Problem Solving |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | K. Ann Renninger, Gertraud Benke, Ricardo Böheim, Julien Corven, Maria Consuelo De Dios, Maeve R. Hogan, Moe Htet Kyaw, Ana G. Michels, Marina Nakayama, Pablo E. Torres, Helena Werneck, Feven Yar |
| Source: | Frontline Learning Research. 2025 13(2):67-101. |
| Availability: | European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction. Peterseliegang 1, Box 1, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. e-mail: info@frontlinelearningresearch.org; Web site: http://journals.sfu.ca/flr/index.php/journal/index |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 35 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Junior High Schools Middle Schools Secondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Cooperative Learning, Middle School Students, Problem Solving, Mathematics Education, Executive Function, Learner Engagement, Group Activities, Group Behavior, Virtual Classrooms, Electronic Learning, Teaching Methods, Mathematics Activities, Urban Schools, Cognitive Processes, Student Participation, Student Behavior |
| ISSN: | 2295-3159 |
| Abstract: | Collaborative problem solving (CPS) has been shown to both engage and benefit students' learning of mathematics. However, there is evidence that group work is not always easy to facilitate, in part because educators lack details about learners' engagement during group work: the processes of problem solving involved, and how these are engaged. In this exploratory study, we focused on these processes in the moments of related math activity, or math moments, engaged by two groups of interested, urban, middle-school aged students during four sessions of work in the Virtual Math Teams (VMT) environment. We examined three phases of their problem solving: Exploring, Constructing, and Checking. In addition, to further describe the students' cognitive and behavioral engagement, we considered both the process of students' use of executive functions (EF), during problem solving, termed executive functions in practice (EFP), as well as the stage of CPS (Participation, Cooperation, and Collaboration), during phases of problem solving. We learned that the relation between each phase of problem solving, categories of EFP, and stages of CPS vary; for example, the problem-solving phase of Exploring was found to have a more positive effect on EFP and CPS than either Constructing or Checking. Implications for educational practice, and next steps for related research are described. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2025 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1465284 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| Abstract: | Collaborative problem solving (CPS) has been shown to both engage and benefit students' learning of mathematics. However, there is evidence that group work is not always easy to facilitate, in part because educators lack details about learners' engagement during group work: the processes of problem solving involved, and how these are engaged. In this exploratory study, we focused on these processes in the moments of related math activity, or math moments, engaged by two groups of interested, urban, middle-school aged students during four sessions of work in the Virtual Math Teams (VMT) environment. We examined three phases of their problem solving: Exploring, Constructing, and Checking. In addition, to further describe the students' cognitive and behavioral engagement, we considered both the process of students' use of executive functions (EF), during problem solving, termed executive functions in practice (EFP), as well as the stage of CPS (Participation, Cooperation, and Collaboration), during phases of problem solving. We learned that the relation between each phase of problem solving, categories of EFP, and stages of CPS vary; for example, the problem-solving phase of Exploring was found to have a more positive effect on EFP and CPS than either Constructing or Checking. Implications for educational practice, and next steps for related research are described. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2295-3159 |
