A Scale Development Study for the Evaluation of Digital Content
Saved in:
| Title: | A Scale Development Study for the Evaluation of Digital Content |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Onur Duran (ORCID |
| Source: | International Journal of Technology in Education. 2025 8(2):482-501. |
| Availability: | International Society for Technology, Education, and Science. ISTES Organization, Monument, CO 80132. e-mail: istesorganization@gmail.com; e-mail: ijteoffice@gmail.com; Web site: https://www.ijte.net/index.php/ijte/about |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 21 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Scoring Rubrics, Web 2.0 Technologies, Validity, Reliability, Preservice Teachers, Science Teachers, Instructional Materials, Technology Uses in Education, Foreign Countries |
| Geographic Terms: | Turkey |
| ISSN: | 2689-2758 |
| Abstract: | This study aimed to develop a rubric for evaluating digital contents specifically Web 2.0 tools in education to improve the quality of digital content, as well as to assess the rubric's validity and reliability. Data were collected from pre-service science teachers in their third year. In the development process, expert opinions were sought, and the rubric's items, criteria, and proficiency levels were created based on relevant literature. The draft rubric was used to evaluate digital contents prepared by these pre-service teachers, followed by analyzes to ensure validity and reliability. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Cronbach's Alpha, and Kappa analyzes were performed on the collected data. EFA revealed that the 25-item rubric explained 52.70% of the total variance, with factor loadings between 0.498 and 0.862 across three factors. CFA results showed a X[superscript 2]/sd value of 1.437 and an RMSEA value of 0.071. The rubric's internal consistency was measured with a Cronbach's Alpha coefficient of 0.785. To further assess reliability, kappa analysis indicated a moderate inter-rater agreement with a kappa value of 0.64. Based on these results, the EWES rubric is considered both a valid and reliable evaluation tool. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2025 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1472624 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1472624 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1472624 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: A Scale Development Study for the Evaluation of Digital Content – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Onur+Duran%22">Onur Duran</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8662-8813">0000-0002-8662-8813</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ayse+Oguz+Unver%22">Ayse Oguz Unver</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2938-5269">0000-0003-2938-5269</externalLink>) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22International+Journal+of+Technology+in+Education%22"><i>International Journal of Technology in Education</i></searchLink>. 2025 8(2):482-501. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: International Society for Technology, Education, and Science. ISTES Organization, Monument, CO 80132. e-mail: istesorganization@gmail.com; e-mail: ijteoffice@gmail.com; Web site: https://www.ijte.net/index.php/ijte/about – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 21 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scoring+Rubrics%22">Scoring Rubrics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Web+2%2E0+Technologies%22">Web 2.0 Technologies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Validity%22">Validity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reliability%22">Reliability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Preservice+Teachers%22">Preservice Teachers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Science+Teachers%22">Science Teachers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Instructional+Materials%22">Instructional Materials</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Technology+Uses+in+Education%22">Technology Uses in Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Turkey%22">Turkey</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 2689-2758 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This study aimed to develop a rubric for evaluating digital contents specifically Web 2.0 tools in education to improve the quality of digital content, as well as to assess the rubric's validity and reliability. Data were collected from pre-service science teachers in their third year. In the development process, expert opinions were sought, and the rubric's items, criteria, and proficiency levels were created based on relevant literature. The draft rubric was used to evaluate digital contents prepared by these pre-service teachers, followed by analyzes to ensure validity and reliability. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Cronbach's Alpha, and Kappa analyzes were performed on the collected data. EFA revealed that the 25-item rubric explained 52.70% of the total variance, with factor loadings between 0.498 and 0.862 across three factors. CFA results showed a X[superscript 2]/sd value of 1.437 and an RMSEA value of 0.071. The rubric's internal consistency was measured with a Cronbach's Alpha coefficient of 0.785. To further assess reliability, kappa analysis indicated a moderate inter-rater agreement with a kappa value of 0.64. Based on these results, the EWES rubric is considered both a valid and reliable evaluation tool. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1472624 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1472624 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 21 StartPage: 482 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Scoring Rubrics Type: general – SubjectFull: Web 2.0 Technologies Type: general – SubjectFull: Validity Type: general – SubjectFull: Reliability Type: general – SubjectFull: Preservice Teachers Type: general – SubjectFull: Science Teachers Type: general – SubjectFull: Instructional Materials Type: general – SubjectFull: Technology Uses in Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries Type: general – SubjectFull: Turkey Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: A Scale Development Study for the Evaluation of Digital Content Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Onur Duran – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ayse Oguz Unver IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-electronic Value: 2689-2758 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 8 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: International Journal of Technology in Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |