The Etiology of the Association between Parental Nurturance and Youth Antisocial Behavior: Evidence from a Twin Differences Study

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The Etiology of the Association between Parental Nurturance and Youth Antisocial Behavior: Evidence from a Twin Differences Study
Language: English
Authors: Alaina M. Di Dio (ORCID 0000-0001-8618-0601), Elizabeth A. Shewark (ORCID 0000-0002-9481-0789), Daniel Thaler (ORCID 0000-0003-2232-7699), S. Alexandra Burt (ORCID 0000-0001-5538-7431)
Source: JCPP Advances. 2025 5(2).
Availability: Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 12
Publication Date: 2025
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) (DHHS/NIH)
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) (DHHS/NIH)
Contract Number: R01HD066040
R01MH081813
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Parenting Styles, Parent Child Relationship, Antisocial Behavior, Twins, Environmental Influences, Genetics, Children, Preadolescents
Geographic Terms: Michigan
DOI: 10.1002/jcv2.12269
ISSN: 2692-9384
Abstract: Background: Lower parental nurturance is consistently associated with higher levels of youth antisocial behavior (ASB), but the etiology of this association remains unclear. To fill this gap, we employed a twin differences approach to illuminate the environmental and genetic origins of the association between parental nurturance and children's ASB. Methods: Participants were 2060 twins (49% female) ages 6-10 from the Michigan State University Twin Registry. Parental nurturance and youth ASB were assessed using multiple measures (e.g., questionnaires, interviews) and informant reports (e.g., twins, parents, teachers). Co-twin difference-score correlations were analyzed separately by zygosity using specification curve analysis, an exhaustive modeling approach that examined associations across all possible specifications of the nurturance and ASB data. Results: Parental nurturance demonstrated clear, negatively signed associations with youth ASB at the individual level. However, these associations generally did not persist within twin pairs. We observed no significant twin difference correlations within monozygotic (MZ) pairs and only a handful of significant twin difference correlations among dizygotic (DZ) pairs, in which the DZ co-twin who experienced more nurturance exhibited less ASB. Post-hoc analyses in these data revealed that these associations differed markedly from those with harsh parenting that suggested environmental influences on youth ASB. Conclusions: These results strongly argue against a causal influence of low parental nurturance on youth ASB, and instead suggest that genetic influences and shared environmental confounds underlie their association. Further, findings strongly suggest that different parenting behaviors are associated with child ASB via different etiologic mechanisms.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2025
Accession Number: EJ1473742
Database: ERIC
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:Background: Lower parental nurturance is consistently associated with higher levels of youth antisocial behavior (ASB), but the etiology of this association remains unclear. To fill this gap, we employed a twin differences approach to illuminate the environmental and genetic origins of the association between parental nurturance and children's ASB. Methods: Participants were 2060 twins (49% female) ages 6-10 from the Michigan State University Twin Registry. Parental nurturance and youth ASB were assessed using multiple measures (e.g., questionnaires, interviews) and informant reports (e.g., twins, parents, teachers). Co-twin difference-score correlations were analyzed separately by zygosity using specification curve analysis, an exhaustive modeling approach that examined associations across all possible specifications of the nurturance and ASB data. Results: Parental nurturance demonstrated clear, negatively signed associations with youth ASB at the individual level. However, these associations generally did not persist within twin pairs. We observed no significant twin difference correlations within monozygotic (MZ) pairs and only a handful of significant twin difference correlations among dizygotic (DZ) pairs, in which the DZ co-twin who experienced more nurturance exhibited less ASB. Post-hoc analyses in these data revealed that these associations differed markedly from those with harsh parenting that suggested environmental influences on youth ASB. Conclusions: These results strongly argue against a causal influence of low parental nurturance on youth ASB, and instead suggest that genetic influences and shared environmental confounds underlie their association. Further, findings strongly suggest that different parenting behaviors are associated with child ASB via different etiologic mechanisms.
ISSN:2692-9384
DOI:10.1002/jcv2.12269