Predictive Ability of Thinking Styles in the Level of Self among AI Al-Bayt University Students
Saved in:
| Title: | Predictive Ability of Thinking Styles in the Level of Self among AI Al-Bayt University Students |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Adnan Atoum, Omar Al-Adamat, Yousef Wardat |
| Source: | Educational Process: International Journal. Article e2025094 2025 15. |
| Availability: | UNIVERSITEPARK Limited. iTOWER Plaza (No61, 9th floor) Merkez Mh Akar Cd No3, Sisli, Istanbul, Turkey 34382. e-mail: editor@edupij.com; Web site: http://www.edupij.com/ |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 11 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Cognitive Style, Self Concept, Student Attitudes, Undergraduate Students, Rating Scales, Correlation, Educational Practices, Universities, Predictive Validity, Student Development, Foreign Countries |
| Geographic Terms: | Jordan |
| ISSN: | 2147-0901 2564-8020 |
| Abstract: | Background/purpose: This study aimed to investigate the predictive ability of thinking styles (synthetic, idealists, pragmatists, analysts, and realists) in the level of self among undergraduate students at Al al-Bayt University in Jordan and to identify the prevailing thinking styles. Materials/Methods: The study included a sample of 357 undergraduate students from Al al-Bayt University. The self-scale and the thinkingstyles scale were administered after proper validity and reliability procedures were ensured. Results: The findings revealed that the level of self among students was high. The prevailing thinking styles, in order, were realists, analysts, pragmatists, synthetic, and idealists. Thinking styles collectively contributed to explaining 19.1% of the variance in the self-scale, with the realistic style accounting for 17.9% and the synthetic style explaining an additional 1.2%. Conclusion: The study highlights the significant role of thinking styles, particularly the realistic style, in predicting self-level among students. These findings provide valuable insights into the relationship between thinking styles and self, offering implications for educational practices and student development. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2025 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1475838 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| Abstract: | Background/purpose: This study aimed to investigate the predictive ability of thinking styles (synthetic, idealists, pragmatists, analysts, and realists) in the level of self among undergraduate students at Al al-Bayt University in Jordan and to identify the prevailing thinking styles. Materials/Methods: The study included a sample of 357 undergraduate students from Al al-Bayt University. The self-scale and the thinkingstyles scale were administered after proper validity and reliability procedures were ensured. Results: The findings revealed that the level of self among students was high. The prevailing thinking styles, in order, were realists, analysts, pragmatists, synthetic, and idealists. Thinking styles collectively contributed to explaining 19.1% of the variance in the self-scale, with the realistic style accounting for 17.9% and the synthetic style explaining an additional 1.2%. Conclusion: The study highlights the significant role of thinking styles, particularly the realistic style, in predicting self-level among students. These findings provide valuable insights into the relationship between thinking styles and self, offering implications for educational practices and student development. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2147-0901 2564-8020 |
