Recommendation Section of Psychoeducational Reports: A Barrier or Opportunity to Promote Inclusion in Early Education and Care?

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Recommendation Section of Psychoeducational Reports: A Barrier or Opportunity to Promote Inclusion in Early Education and Care?
Language: English
Authors: Agnete Vaags (ORCID 0009-0007-2314-6706), Marit Uthus (ORCID 0000-0003-1263-1486)
Source: Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs. 2025 25(3):631-643.
Availability: Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 13
Publication Date: 2025
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Early Childhood Education
Descriptors: Psychoeducational Methods, Inclusion, Early Childhood Education, Reports, Special Education, Barriers, Preschool Children, Skill Development, Ability, Performance Based Assessment, Holistic Approach
DOI: 10.1111/1471-3802.12749
ISSN: 1471-3802
Abstract: Psychoeducational reports prepared by the Educational Psychological Service are foundational for special educational support in Norway, ensuring equitable opportunities for development, learning and participation among children with special educational needs in mainstream Early Childhood Education and Care settings. This qualitative study examines the characteristics of recommended goals and support measures in these reports, and how they promote or inhibit inclusion. Through a holistic approach, the study explores individual and social contextual considerations within the recommendation sections of seven reports for children aged 3-5 years. Employing reflexive thematic analysis, our findings suggest that while certain measures promote children's participation in inclusive communities, there is a predominant focus on the individual child. This emphasis often centres on skill acquisition and ability development through performance-based goals and compensatory measures. However, while most recommendations are individually oriented, certain measures appear generalised and broadly applicable to most children, highlighting the challenges of addressing each child's unique needs in their specific context. The study's implications underscore the necessity for a holistic approach in the field of special education, both at the policy and legislative levels. Such an approach is essential for enabling psychoeducational reports to promote inclusion in early childhood education and care settings.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2025
Accession Number: EJ1476543
Database: ERIC
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:Psychoeducational reports prepared by the Educational Psychological Service are foundational for special educational support in Norway, ensuring equitable opportunities for development, learning and participation among children with special educational needs in mainstream Early Childhood Education and Care settings. This qualitative study examines the characteristics of recommended goals and support measures in these reports, and how they promote or inhibit inclusion. Through a holistic approach, the study explores individual and social contextual considerations within the recommendation sections of seven reports for children aged 3-5 years. Employing reflexive thematic analysis, our findings suggest that while certain measures promote children's participation in inclusive communities, there is a predominant focus on the individual child. This emphasis often centres on skill acquisition and ability development through performance-based goals and compensatory measures. However, while most recommendations are individually oriented, certain measures appear generalised and broadly applicable to most children, highlighting the challenges of addressing each child's unique needs in their specific context. The study's implications underscore the necessity for a holistic approach in the field of special education, both at the policy and legislative levels. Such an approach is essential for enabling psychoeducational reports to promote inclusion in early childhood education and care settings.
ISSN:1471-3802
DOI:10.1111/1471-3802.12749