Academia in the Time of COVID-19: Examining Experiences of Oppression amongst STEM Women Faculty

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Academia in the Time of COVID-19: Examining Experiences of Oppression amongst STEM Women Faculty
Language: English
Authors: Margo Gregor (ORCID 0000-0002-2121-8282), Kelly A. Burke, Alyssa Eversmeyer (ORCID 0000-0003-3698-5051), Keena C. Singletary, Alejandra Gonzalez (ORCID 0000-0002-2525-2832), Abigail L. Stark, Avantika Bhatia
Source: Journal of Career Development. 2025 52(5):630-647.
Availability: SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 18
Publication Date: 2025
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: STEM Careers, College Faculty, Women Faculty, Gender Bias, COVID-19, Pandemics, Equal Opportunities (Jobs), Racism, Mothers, Caregivers, Work Environment, Mental Health, Family Work Relationship, Minority Group Teachers
DOI: 10.1177/08948453251372906
ISSN: 0894-8453
1556-0856
Abstract: This research highlights the voices of 92 STEM women in academia who responded to a series of open-ended questions regarding their experiences of oppression during the COVID-19 pandemic and the impact of those oppressive experiences. Consensual Qualitative Research-Modified (CQR-M) was chosen as a methodological and analytical approach, as it allows for examination of large samples with brief qualitative data. The main findings reveal substantial concerns about the frequency and content of participants' experiences of marginalization, particularly overt and covert sexism and racism and disadvantages to mothers and caregivers during the pandemic. Additionally, the results highlight the impacts of marginalization, including work disruptions, within-person changes, and mental health concerns. Clinical implications, future research directions, and social advocacy interventions in the context of COVID-19's lasting impact on remote work and tenure acquisition will be discussed.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2025
Accession Number: EJ1483286
Database: ERIC
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:This research highlights the voices of 92 STEM women in academia who responded to a series of open-ended questions regarding their experiences of oppression during the COVID-19 pandemic and the impact of those oppressive experiences. Consensual Qualitative Research-Modified (CQR-M) was chosen as a methodological and analytical approach, as it allows for examination of large samples with brief qualitative data. The main findings reveal substantial concerns about the frequency and content of participants' experiences of marginalization, particularly overt and covert sexism and racism and disadvantages to mothers and caregivers during the pandemic. Additionally, the results highlight the impacts of marginalization, including work disruptions, within-person changes, and mental health concerns. Clinical implications, future research directions, and social advocacy interventions in the context of COVID-19's lasting impact on remote work and tenure acquisition will be discussed.
ISSN:0894-8453
1556-0856
DOI:10.1177/08948453251372906