Manuscript-Style Dissertation Format Guidelines in Counselor Education: A Content Analysis

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Manuscript-Style Dissertation Format Guidelines in Counselor Education: A Content Analysis
Language: English
Authors: Phillip L. Waalkes (ORCID 0000-0002-2956-5078), Daniel A. DeCino (ORCID 0000-0002-5514-3063), Jacqueline M. Swank (ORCID 0000-0003-2060-5835), Yuima Mizutani (ORCID 0000-0001-9183-7831), Monica Maria Phelps-Pineda (ORCID 0000-0001-8084-1122), Tiffany Somerville (ORCID 0000-0003-0400-7982)
Source: Counselor Education and Supervision. 2025 64(3):331-340.
Availability: Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 10
Publication Date: 2025
Document Type: Journal Articles
Information Analyses
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Doctoral Dissertations, Literary Genres, Guidelines, Counselor Training, Content Analysis, Copyrights, Eligibility
DOI: 10.1002/ceas.12347
ISSN: 0011-0035
1556-6978
Abstract: Manuscript-style dissertation formats can help support students in completing and publishing their dissertations. Yet, manuscript-style dissertation guidelines often lack structure and clarity in ways that can cause student confusion and frustration. In this qualitative content analysis, we examined the dissertation structure, process, and support described in the counseling program manuscript-style guidelines (N = 18). Many guidelines lacked clarity and support structures and may benefit from revisions to discuss topics such as copyright and student eligibility.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2025
Accession Number: EJ1483690
Database: ERIC
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:Manuscript-style dissertation formats can help support students in completing and publishing their dissertations. Yet, manuscript-style dissertation guidelines often lack structure and clarity in ways that can cause student confusion and frustration. In this qualitative content analysis, we examined the dissertation structure, process, and support described in the counseling program manuscript-style guidelines (N = 18). Many guidelines lacked clarity and support structures and may benefit from revisions to discuss topics such as copyright and student eligibility.
ISSN:0011-0035
1556-6978
DOI:10.1002/ceas.12347