Universal School Meal Policies and Perceived Stigma: Quantitative Evidence from Eight US States

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Universal School Meal Policies and Perceived Stigma: Quantitative Evidence from Eight US States
Language: English
Authors: Dania Orta-Aleman (ORCID 0000-0001-8581-8714), Monica D. Zuercher (ORCID 0000-0003-2758-9807), Leah E. Chapman, Marlene B. Schwartz (ORCID 0000-0002-8939-1954), Caitlin D. French, Anisha I. Patel, Lorrene Ritchie (ORCID 0000-0002-8038-1821), Juliana Cohen, Wendi Gosliner
Source: Journal of School Health. 2026 96(1).
Availability: Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 9
Publication Date: 2026
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Junior High Schools
Middle Schools
Secondary Education
High Schools
Descriptors: Lunch Programs, Social Bias, Nutrition, Middle School Students, High School Students, Psychological Patterns, Low Income Students, Socioeconomic Status, Student Attitudes, Parent Attitudes, Educational Policy, Intervention, Student Characteristics
Geographic Terms: California, Maine, Massachusetts, Vermont, Arizona, Texas, Illinois, New Hampshire
DOI: 10.1111/josh.70098
ISSN: 0022-4391
1746-1561
Abstract: Background: Universal school meals (USMs) policies, which provide free meals to all students regardless of income, have the potential to improve child nutrition and reduce stigma. Quantitative evidence on the association between USM and stigma is limited. Methods: Leveraging a natural policy variation in state-level USM implementation, we surveyed 1066 middle and high school students from eight US states (four with USM, four without) during the 2022-2023 school year. Stigma was measured as self-reported embarrassment about eating school lunch. We used generalized estimating equations to examine the associations between USM, embarrassment, and lunch participation. Results: Overall about one in nine students (11.5%) across all surveyed states reported embarrassment, which was associated with 11% less frequent (aRR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.83-0.97). School lunch participation overall, especially among those from low-income families. While USM was associated with lower odds of embarrassment among students from low-income families, higher-income students in USM states were more likely to feel embarrassed. Implications: Addressing stigma requires pairing USM with strategies to enhance meal quality, cultural relevance, and inclusive messaging. Conclusions: USM can alleviate stigma for lower-income students yet may increase embarrassment among higher-income peers, highlighting the need for comprehensive approaches benefiting all socioeconomic groups.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2026
Accession Number: EJ1492064
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:Background: Universal school meals (USMs) policies, which provide free meals to all students regardless of income, have the potential to improve child nutrition and reduce stigma. Quantitative evidence on the association between USM and stigma is limited. Methods: Leveraging a natural policy variation in state-level USM implementation, we surveyed 1066 middle and high school students from eight US states (four with USM, four without) during the 2022-2023 school year. Stigma was measured as self-reported embarrassment about eating school lunch. We used generalized estimating equations to examine the associations between USM, embarrassment, and lunch participation. Results: Overall about one in nine students (11.5%) across all surveyed states reported embarrassment, which was associated with 11% less frequent (aRR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.83-0.97). School lunch participation overall, especially among those from low-income families. While USM was associated with lower odds of embarrassment among students from low-income families, higher-income students in USM states were more likely to feel embarrassed. Implications: Addressing stigma requires pairing USM with strategies to enhance meal quality, cultural relevance, and inclusive messaging. Conclusions: USM can alleviate stigma for lower-income students yet may increase embarrassment among higher-income peers, highlighting the need for comprehensive approaches benefiting all socioeconomic groups.
ISSN:0022-4391
1746-1561
DOI:10.1111/josh.70098