Partnerships Supporting Young People to Negotiate Complex Pathways from School

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Partnerships Supporting Young People to Negotiate Complex Pathways from School
Language: English
Authors: Emily S. Rudling (ORCID 0000-0002-8262-687X), Sherridan Emery (ORCID 0000-0003-2949-2793), Kitty Te Riele (ORCID 0000-0002-8826-1701), Jessica Woodroffe (ORCID 0000-0003-1798-9655), Tess Crellin, Becky Shelley (ORCID 0000-0002-6288-592X), Gemma Burns, Robert Alderson
Source: Journal of Adolescence. 2026 98(1):145-159.
Availability: Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 15
Publication Date: 2026
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Education Work Relationship, Young Adults, Career Pathways, Foreign Countries, Partnerships in Education, Program Design, Educational Policy, Educational Practices
Geographic Terms: Australia
DOI: 10.1002/jad.70047
ISSN: 0140-1971
1095-9254
Abstract: Introduction: The school-to-work transition (SWT) is complex for young people. The postpandemic era, characterized by rapidly evolving economies and technologies, has augmented the complexity of negotiating such pathways. Despite this, young people--understood here through the lens of emergent adulthood--are often positioned as wholly responsible for navigating their own pathways beyond school. Methods: A pragmatic case study approach was used to analyze qualitative data collected from three SWT partnership programs (UniHub, Australian School-based Apprenticeships [ASbAs], and Regional Learning Pathways [RLPs]) aimed at young people (2018-2023) in regional areas of Tasmania, Australia. For each program, participants were interviewed (N = 6 [UniHub]; N = 23 [ASbAs]; N = 44 [RLPs]) and surveyed (N = 350 [UniHub]; N = 21 [ASbAs]), and data were thematically analyzed to identify the role of boundary-crossers in SWT partnerships. Results: Boundary-crosser work emerged as a key component of the sampled SWT partnerships. Enabling features of boundary-crossing work in partnerships include accessibility, support contextualized to the region and individual--like reducing barriers to equity--and using clear communication approaches. This role redistributed responsibility in the SWT to a partnership between schools, pathways, and young people. Conclusions: Whereas literature and policy underscore the economic and developmental importance of SWT, the contribution of this article is research and data that nuance understanding of how SWT partnerships can share the responsibility of the SWT by designing in the program a boundary-crosser role. The concept of boundary-crosser work in SWT partnerships offers a novel approach for policymakers in policy and practice to rethink how the SWT is supported.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2026
Accession Number: EJ1493527
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:Introduction: The school-to-work transition (SWT) is complex for young people. The postpandemic era, characterized by rapidly evolving economies and technologies, has augmented the complexity of negotiating such pathways. Despite this, young people--understood here through the lens of emergent adulthood--are often positioned as wholly responsible for navigating their own pathways beyond school. Methods: A pragmatic case study approach was used to analyze qualitative data collected from three SWT partnership programs (UniHub, Australian School-based Apprenticeships [ASbAs], and Regional Learning Pathways [RLPs]) aimed at young people (2018-2023) in regional areas of Tasmania, Australia. For each program, participants were interviewed (N = 6 [UniHub]; N = 23 [ASbAs]; N = 44 [RLPs]) and surveyed (N = 350 [UniHub]; N = 21 [ASbAs]), and data were thematically analyzed to identify the role of boundary-crossers in SWT partnerships. Results: Boundary-crosser work emerged as a key component of the sampled SWT partnerships. Enabling features of boundary-crossing work in partnerships include accessibility, support contextualized to the region and individual--like reducing barriers to equity--and using clear communication approaches. This role redistributed responsibility in the SWT to a partnership between schools, pathways, and young people. Conclusions: Whereas literature and policy underscore the economic and developmental importance of SWT, the contribution of this article is research and data that nuance understanding of how SWT partnerships can share the responsibility of the SWT by designing in the program a boundary-crosser role. The concept of boundary-crosser work in SWT partnerships offers a novel approach for policymakers in policy and practice to rethink how the SWT is supported.
ISSN:0140-1971
1095-9254
DOI:10.1002/jad.70047