The Way Technology Teachers Think: The Role of Metaphor and Reflection for Technology Education Practice

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The Way Technology Teachers Think: The Role of Metaphor and Reflection for Technology Education Practice
Language: English
Authors: Andreas Larsson
Source: Design and Technology Education. 2025 30(3):16-32.
Availability: Design and Technology Association. 11 Manor Court, Banbury, OX16 5TB, UK. Tel: +44-1789-470007; Fax: +44-1789-470-007; e-mail: info@data.org.uk; Web site: https://openjournals.ljmu.ac.uk/DesignTechnologyEducation
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 17
Publication Date: 2025
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Elementary Education
Grade 4
Intermediate Grades
Grade 5
Middle Schools
Grade 6
Grade 7
Junior High Schools
Secondary Education
Grade 8
Grade 9
High Schools
Descriptors: Figurative Language, Reflection, Technology Education, Compulsory Education, Teaching Experience, Foreign Countries, Grade 4, Grade 5, Grade 6, Grade 7, Grade 8, Grade 9, Teacher Attitudes, Cognitive Structures
Geographic Terms: Sweden
ISSN: 1360-1431
2040-8633
Abstract: This study investigates how technology teachers reflect on their practice by examining the metaphorical structures that underpin their reasoning. Drawing on Conceptual Metaphor Theory and supported by an AI-assisted Metaphor Identification Procedure (MIP), the analysis focuses on recurring metaphorical themes that shape how teachers make sense of challenges, plan instruction, and imagine future classroom scenarios. The results reveal a set of interrelated themes -- such as time as a resource, learning as motion, teaching as burden, and structure as cohesion -- that reflect and reinforce a view of teaching as a managed and goal-oriented activity. These metaphors are not merely descriptive devices; they function as cognitive tools that organise experience and support pedagogical decision-making. By framing teaching through metaphors of motion, containment, construction, and effort, teachers can navigate complex classroom dynamics and articulate a coherent sense of professional agency. The findings suggest that metaphor plays a dual role in reflection: both representing experience and guiding prospective reasoning. In this sense, metaphors support what is often described as reflection-for-action, where familiar conceptual frames are used to simulate possible futures. By surfacing these metaphorical patterns, the study contributes to a deeper understanding of how teachers conceptualise their work and offers a foundation for professional dialogue and development in technology education.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2026
Accession Number: EJ1493904
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:This study investigates how technology teachers reflect on their practice by examining the metaphorical structures that underpin their reasoning. Drawing on Conceptual Metaphor Theory and supported by an AI-assisted Metaphor Identification Procedure (MIP), the analysis focuses on recurring metaphorical themes that shape how teachers make sense of challenges, plan instruction, and imagine future classroom scenarios. The results reveal a set of interrelated themes -- such as time as a resource, learning as motion, teaching as burden, and structure as cohesion -- that reflect and reinforce a view of teaching as a managed and goal-oriented activity. These metaphors are not merely descriptive devices; they function as cognitive tools that organise experience and support pedagogical decision-making. By framing teaching through metaphors of motion, containment, construction, and effort, teachers can navigate complex classroom dynamics and articulate a coherent sense of professional agency. The findings suggest that metaphor plays a dual role in reflection: both representing experience and guiding prospective reasoning. In this sense, metaphors support what is often described as reflection-for-action, where familiar conceptual frames are used to simulate possible futures. By surfacing these metaphorical patterns, the study contributes to a deeper understanding of how teachers conceptualise their work and offers a foundation for professional dialogue and development in technology education.
ISSN:1360-1431
2040-8633