Dual Perspective Assessment of the Development Level and Characteristics of Intelligent Educational Software in China
Saved in:
| Title: | Dual Perspective Assessment of the Development Level and Characteristics of Intelligent Educational Software in China |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Bo Zhang (ORCID |
| Source: | SAGE Open. 2025 15(4). |
| Availability: | SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 18 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Elementary Secondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Foreign Countries, Educational Technology, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Software, Computer Software Evaluation, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Man Machine Systems, Educational Trends, Educational Innovation |
| Geographic Terms: | China |
| DOI: | 10.1177/21582440251387420 |
| ISSN: | 2158-2440 |
| Abstract: | While the market offers a wide variety of intelligent educational software, inconsistent quality often prevents these tools from effectively meeting practical teaching needs. This makes it difficult for educators to determine the suitability of specific software for their classrooms. To address this challenge, this study developed a set of evaluation indicators for intelligent educational software used in primary and secondary schools. These indicators were established through market research, literature review, and feedback from both subject experts and teachers. By comparing and analyzing evaluations of commonly used software from both teachers and educational technology experts, this study aims to understand the current development level and characteristics of intelligent educational software in China. Initial findings reveal that while such software demonstrates strong performance in certain educational scenarios, it falls short in others. Interestingly, there are subtle differences in how teachers and education professionals perceive the software's effectiveness in specific teaching contexts. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2026 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1495688 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1495688 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Dual Perspective Assessment of the Development Level and Characteristics of Intelligent Educational Software in China – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Bo+Zhang%22">Bo Zhang</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6529-8720">0000-0002-6529-8720</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Xinying+Wang%22">Xinying Wang</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Yuanyuan+Li%22">Yuanyuan Li</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Yuhan+Chen%22">Yuhan Chen</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Xiaoqing+Gu%22">Xiaoqing Gu</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8256-5408">0000-0001-8256-5408</externalLink>) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22SAGE+Open%22"><i>SAGE Open</i></searchLink>. 2025 15(4). – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 18 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Elementary+Secondary+Education%22">Elementary Secondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Technology%22">Educational Technology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Artificial+Intelligence%22">Artificial Intelligence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+Software%22">Computer Software</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+Software+Evaluation%22">Computer Software Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Elementary+Secondary+Education%22">Elementary Secondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+Methods%22">Evaluation Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Man+Machine+Systems%22">Man Machine Systems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Trends%22">Educational Trends</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Innovation%22">Educational Innovation</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22China%22">China</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1177/21582440251387420 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 2158-2440 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: While the market offers a wide variety of intelligent educational software, inconsistent quality often prevents these tools from effectively meeting practical teaching needs. This makes it difficult for educators to determine the suitability of specific software for their classrooms. To address this challenge, this study developed a set of evaluation indicators for intelligent educational software used in primary and secondary schools. These indicators were established through market research, literature review, and feedback from both subject experts and teachers. By comparing and analyzing evaluations of commonly used software from both teachers and educational technology experts, this study aims to understand the current development level and characteristics of intelligent educational software in China. Initial findings reveal that while such software demonstrates strong performance in certain educational scenarios, it falls short in others. Interestingly, there are subtle differences in how teachers and education professionals perceive the software's effectiveness in specific teaching contexts. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1495688 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1495688 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1177/21582440251387420 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 18 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Technology Type: general – SubjectFull: Artificial Intelligence Type: general – SubjectFull: Computer Software Type: general – SubjectFull: Computer Software Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Elementary Secondary Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluation Methods Type: general – SubjectFull: Man Machine Systems Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Trends Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Innovation Type: general – SubjectFull: China Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Dual Perspective Assessment of the Development Level and Characteristics of Intelligent Educational Software in China Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Bo Zhang – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Xinying Wang – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Yuanyuan Li – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Yuhan Chen – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Xiaoqing Gu IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 10 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-electronic Value: 2158-2440 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 15 – Type: issue Value: 4 Titles: – TitleFull: SAGE Open Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |