View in EDS

Short Take: An Approach to Decision-Making in Community-Based Participatory Research to Foster Co-Ownership and Trust

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Short Take: An Approach to Decision-Making in Community-Based Participatory Research to Foster Co-Ownership and Trust
Language: English
Authors: Teal W. Benevides (ORCID 0000-0003-1395-2628), Stephen M. Shore, Julia M. Heinly (ORCID 0000-0002-9193-7266), Daylin Delgado (ORCID 0000-0002-5943-9603), Reid Caplan, Becca Lory Hector, Liane Holliday-Willey, Lindsey Nebeker (ORCID 0009-0003-9679-1205), Karl Wittig, Danielle Roubinov, Brenna B. Maddox, Shari Jager-Hyman
Source: Field Methods. 2026 38(1):76-84.
Availability: SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 9
Publication Date: 2026
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Descriptive
Descriptors: Community Involvement, Participatory Research, Ownership, Trust (Psychology), Participative Decision Making, Power Structure, Governance, Feedback (Response), Accountability, Inclusion
DOI: 10.1177/1525822X251339954
ISSN: 1525-822X
1552-3969
Abstract: This Short Take describes the rationale for, and use of, a decision-making process in community-engaged comparative effectiveness research, co-led by community researchers and academic researchers. The contribution of this methodological guide is to (1) ensure that all partners have a voice in contributing to major study decisions; (2) distribute power equally; (3) avoid power differentials; (4) increase trust; and (5) promote shared governance in research.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2026
Accession Number: EJ1496594
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:This Short Take describes the rationale for, and use of, a decision-making process in community-engaged comparative effectiveness research, co-led by community researchers and academic researchers. The contribution of this methodological guide is to (1) ensure that all partners have a voice in contributing to major study decisions; (2) distribute power equally; (3) avoid power differentials; (4) increase trust; and (5) promote shared governance in research.
ISSN:1525-822X
1552-3969
DOI:10.1177/1525822X251339954