The Interplay of Automated Formative Feedback and Instructional Prompts in Developing Summarising Skills
Saved in:
| Title: | The Interplay of Automated Formative Feedback and Instructional Prompts in Developing Summarising Skills |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Veronika Barkela (ORCID |
| Source: | Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 2026 42(2). |
| Availability: | Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 15 |
| Publication Date: | 2026 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education Elementary Education |
| Descriptors: | Feedback (Response), Automation, Formative Evaluation, Cues, Skill Development, Undergraduate Students, Elementary Education, Education Majors, Reciprocal Teaching, Teaching Methods, Thinking Skills, Communication (Thought Transfer), Cognitive Processes |
| DOI: | 10.1002/jcal.70193 |
| ISSN: | 0266-4909 1365-2729 |
| Abstract: | Background: Summarising has been shown to be an effective learning strategy as it enhances cognitive skills, communication abilities and information processing. Effective summarising skills are therefore an important academic asset for university students. Yet, undergraduates struggle to employ effective summarising strategies, thus needing support. Objective: We aim to investigate the effectiveness of automated formative feedback versus instructional prompts based on reciprocal teaching in improving summarising skills. We also explore if combining both feedback and prompts offers any additional benefits in enhancing these skills. Methods: N = 254 elementary education students were asked to summarise six scientific texts, with one group (N = 87) receiving automated formative feedback, one group (N = 75) receiving instructional prompts based on reciprocal teaching and one group (N = 92) receiving a combination of both. Results and Conclusion: Automated formative feedback outperformed instructional prompts based on reciprocal teaching in supporting the development of summarising skills. Combining the two did not have a significant additional effect. At first sight, this may indicate that learning potential is maximised with automated formative feedback. However, students in the combination group requested slightly less feedback, which indicates a possible substitution effect between automated formative feedback and instructional prompts. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2026 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1500478 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| Abstract: | Background: Summarising has been shown to be an effective learning strategy as it enhances cognitive skills, communication abilities and information processing. Effective summarising skills are therefore an important academic asset for university students. Yet, undergraduates struggle to employ effective summarising strategies, thus needing support. Objective: We aim to investigate the effectiveness of automated formative feedback versus instructional prompts based on reciprocal teaching in improving summarising skills. We also explore if combining both feedback and prompts offers any additional benefits in enhancing these skills. Methods: N = 254 elementary education students were asked to summarise six scientific texts, with one group (N = 87) receiving automated formative feedback, one group (N = 75) receiving instructional prompts based on reciprocal teaching and one group (N = 92) receiving a combination of both. Results and Conclusion: Automated formative feedback outperformed instructional prompts based on reciprocal teaching in supporting the development of summarising skills. Combining the two did not have a significant additional effect. At first sight, this may indicate that learning potential is maximised with automated formative feedback. However, students in the combination group requested slightly less feedback, which indicates a possible substitution effect between automated formative feedback and instructional prompts. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0266-4909 1365-2729 |
| DOI: | 10.1002/jcal.70193 |
