Teaching Critical Thinking with Argument Mapping

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Teaching Critical Thinking with Argument Mapping
Language: English
Authors: David L. Rousseau, Tim van Gelder
Source: Journal of Political Science Education. 2025 21(3):406-422.
Availability: Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 17
Publication Date: 2025
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Descriptive
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Critical Thinking, Persuasive Discourse, Concept Mapping, Undergraduate Students, Teaching Methods, Political Science, Public Policy, Majors (Students), Assignments
Geographic Terms: New York (Albany)
DOI: 10.1080/15512169.2024.2388821
ISSN: 1551-2169
1551-2177
Abstract: Critical thinking is the cornerstone of any undergraduate education. One technique for helping students develop critical thinking skills is "argument mapping." Argument mapping involves diagraming the arguments for and against a proposition. The map also includes each piece of evidence used to support these arguments. Argument mapping can help students avoid confirmation bias by bringing attention to arguments and evidence which may run counter to their prior beliefs. It also prompts consideration of the strength of arguments and the quality of evidence. We describe how argument mapping can be incorporated in an undergraduate class and then present an example of a classroom exercise. The exercise involves mapping the arguments in a speech by American Secretary of State Colin Powell justifying the use of military force in Iraq before the United Nations Security Council in February 2013.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2026
Accession Number: EJ1502164
Database: ERIC
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:Critical thinking is the cornerstone of any undergraduate education. One technique for helping students develop critical thinking skills is "argument mapping." Argument mapping involves diagraming the arguments for and against a proposition. The map also includes each piece of evidence used to support these arguments. Argument mapping can help students avoid confirmation bias by bringing attention to arguments and evidence which may run counter to their prior beliefs. It also prompts consideration of the strength of arguments and the quality of evidence. We describe how argument mapping can be incorporated in an undergraduate class and then present an example of a classroom exercise. The exercise involves mapping the arguments in a speech by American Secretary of State Colin Powell justifying the use of military force in Iraq before the United Nations Security Council in February 2013.
ISSN:1551-2169
1551-2177
DOI:10.1080/15512169.2024.2388821