Learning from Failure for Doctoral Education

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Learning from Failure for Doctoral Education
Language: English
Authors: Elke Stracke (ORCID 0000-0002-5191-756X), Jen Webb (ORCID 0000-0003-4912-7021), Allyson Holbrook (ORCID 0000-0002-8441-4256), Rachel Burke (ORCID 0000-0002-6753-4416), Vijay Kumar (ORCID 0000-0002-4016-0178)
Source: Higher Education Quarterly. 2026 80(2).
Availability: Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 10
Publication Date: 2026
Document Type: Journal Articles
Information Analyses
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Academic Failure, Doctoral Programs, Doctoral Students, Doctoral Dissertations, Exit Examinations, Learning Processes
DOI: 10.1111/hequ.70114
ISSN: 0951-5224
1468-2273
Abstract: Failure in doctoral education is a taboo topic for many supervisors and doctoral candidates. Failure in thesis doctoral examination is hard to admit to or explain and has not been deeply investigated. We aim to disrupt the silence around failure in the doctoral context and generate new discussions relevant to doctoral education. We conduct a theoretical integrative review (TIR), which allows for the inclusion of primary research studies, along with other documents (such as policy documents), in the international context. We seek to explore the learning potentials presented by a better understanding of failure to influence the broader debates about the future of the doctorate in times of uncertainty and crisis.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2026
Accession Number: EJ1503904
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:Failure in doctoral education is a taboo topic for many supervisors and doctoral candidates. Failure in thesis doctoral examination is hard to admit to or explain and has not been deeply investigated. We aim to disrupt the silence around failure in the doctoral context and generate new discussions relevant to doctoral education. We conduct a theoretical integrative review (TIR), which allows for the inclusion of primary research studies, along with other documents (such as policy documents), in the international context. We seek to explore the learning potentials presented by a better understanding of failure to influence the broader debates about the future of the doctorate in times of uncertainty and crisis.
ISSN:0951-5224
1468-2273
DOI:10.1111/hequ.70114