Exploring the Role of Errors in Programming Learning

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Exploring the Role of Errors in Programming Learning
Language: English
Authors: Alyssa Shuang Sha (ORCID 0000-0001-6368-3388), Bernardo Pereira Nunes (ORCID 0000-0001-9764-9401), Jiayi Shen (ORCID 0009-0007-9972-2917)
Source: ACM Transactions on Computing Education. 2026 26(2).
Availability: Association for Computing Machinery. 1601 Broadway 10th Floor, New York, NY 10119. Tel: 800-342-6626; Tel: 212-626-0500; Fax: 212-944-1318; e-mail: acmhelp@acm.org; Web site: http://toce.acm.org/
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 23
Publication Date: 2026
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Programming, Computer Science Education, Error Patterns, Data Analysis
DOI: 10.1145/3778857
ISSN: 1946-6226
Abstract: Computer science students often perceive programming errors as indicators of failure rather than learning opportunities, resulting in frustration, anxiety and dropout. This study investigates how early programming errors can contribute to students' subsequent learning. We hypothesise that the number of errors made by students in the initial learning stage, which is distinct across different learning concepts, is positively correlated with their future learning. Our hypothesis is tested using a real-world dataset consisting of 601 programming questions that were practised by 632 students, with results validated using the ITAP dataset. Through statistical analysis controlling for pre-practice understanding, we identify error-based intervention indicators--specific error thresholds that correlate with maximum improvement rates for different programming concepts. These findings provide evidence-based perspectives on the pedagogical role of errors in computer science education, suggesting concept-specific and proficiency-based instructional approaches for programming education.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2026
Accession Number: EJ1504363
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:Computer science students often perceive programming errors as indicators of failure rather than learning opportunities, resulting in frustration, anxiety and dropout. This study investigates how early programming errors can contribute to students' subsequent learning. We hypothesise that the number of errors made by students in the initial learning stage, which is distinct across different learning concepts, is positively correlated with their future learning. Our hypothesis is tested using a real-world dataset consisting of 601 programming questions that were practised by 632 students, with results validated using the ITAP dataset. Through statistical analysis controlling for pre-practice understanding, we identify error-based intervention indicators--specific error thresholds that correlate with maximum improvement rates for different programming concepts. These findings provide evidence-based perspectives on the pedagogical role of errors in computer science education, suggesting concept-specific and proficiency-based instructional approaches for programming education.
ISSN:1946-6226
DOI:10.1145/3778857