A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Escitalopram in the Treatment of Pediatric Depression

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Escitalopram in the Treatment of Pediatric Depression
Language: English
Authors: Wagner, Karen Dineen, Jonas, Jeffrey, Findling, Robert L.
Source: Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Mar 2006 45(3):280-288.
Availability: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. P.O. Box 1600, Hagerstown, MD 21741. Tel: 800-638-3030; Tel: 301-223-2300; Fax: 301-223-2400; Web site: http://www.lww.com/product/?0890-8567
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 9
Publication Date: 2006
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Pediatrics, Least Squares Statistics, Depression (Psychology), Drug Therapy, Children, Outcomes of Treatment, Adolescents, Symptoms (Individual Disorders), Suicide, Comparative Analysis, Pain
ISSN: 0890-8567
Abstract: Objective: Escitalopram is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressant indicated for use in adults. This trial examined the efficacy and safety of escitalopram in pediatric depression. Method: Patients (6-17 years old) with major depressive disorder were randomized to receive 8 weeks of double-blind flexibly dosed treatment with escitalopram (10-20 mg/day; n = 131) or placebo (n = 133). Randomization was not stratified by age. The primary efficacy measure was the mean change from baseline to endpoint in Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R) scores, using the last observation carried forward approach. Results: A total of 82% of patients completed treatment. Escitalopram did not significantly improve CDRS-R scores compared to placebo at endpoint (least squares mean difference = -1.7, p = 0.31; last observation carried forward). In a post hoc analysis of adolescent (ages 12-17 years) completers, escitalopram significantly improved CDRS-R scores compared with placebo (least squares mean difference = -4.6, p = 0.047). Headache and abdominal pain were the only adverse events in greater than 10% of patients in the escitalopram group. Discontinuation rates caused by adverse events were 1.5% for both groups. Potential suicide-related events were observed in one escitalopram- and two placebo treated patients. There were no completed suicides. Conclusions: Although there were no significant differences between escitalopram and placebo in the total population, the data suggest that escitalopram may have beneficial effects in adolescent patients. Escitalopram appeared to be well tolerated. (Contains 3 figures and 4 tables.)
Abstractor: Author
Number of References: 27
Entry Date: 2007
Access URL: https://www.lww.com/product/?0890-8567
Accession Number: EJ754386
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:Objective: Escitalopram is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressant indicated for use in adults. This trial examined the efficacy and safety of escitalopram in pediatric depression. Method: Patients (6-17 years old) with major depressive disorder were randomized to receive 8 weeks of double-blind flexibly dosed treatment with escitalopram (10-20 mg/day; n = 131) or placebo (n = 133). Randomization was not stratified by age. The primary efficacy measure was the mean change from baseline to endpoint in Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R) scores, using the last observation carried forward approach. Results: A total of 82% of patients completed treatment. Escitalopram did not significantly improve CDRS-R scores compared to placebo at endpoint (least squares mean difference = -1.7, p = 0.31; last observation carried forward). In a post hoc analysis of adolescent (ages 12-17 years) completers, escitalopram significantly improved CDRS-R scores compared with placebo (least squares mean difference = -4.6, p = 0.047). Headache and abdominal pain were the only adverse events in greater than 10% of patients in the escitalopram group. Discontinuation rates caused by adverse events were 1.5% for both groups. Potential suicide-related events were observed in one escitalopram- and two placebo treated patients. There were no completed suicides. Conclusions: Although there were no significant differences between escitalopram and placebo in the total population, the data suggest that escitalopram may have beneficial effects in adolescent patients. Escitalopram appeared to be well tolerated. (Contains 3 figures and 4 tables.)
ISSN:0890-8567