Software Evaluation for Special Needs: Preparing the Preservice Teacher from an Inservice Perspective
Saved in:
| Title: | Software Evaluation for Special Needs: Preparing the Preservice Teacher from an Inservice Perspective |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Weber, Roberta K., Forgan, James W., Schoon, Perry L. |
| Source: | Teacher Education and Special Education. Fall 2002 25(4):342-351. |
| Availability: | Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children. Available from: Allen Press, Inc. 810 East 10th Street, Lawrence, KS 66044. Tel: 800-627-0629; Web site: http://www.tese.org |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Physical Description: | |
| Page Count: | 10 |
| Publication Date: | 2002 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education |
| Descriptors: | Teacher Education Curriculum, Qualitative Research, Instructional Material Evaluation, Computer Software Selection, Questionnaires, Assistive Technology, Teacher Surveys, Teacher Attitudes, Elementary School Teachers, Evaluation Criteria, Check Lists, Special Education |
| ISSN: | 0888-4064 |
| Abstract: | For most experienced educators, choosing software for children with disabilities is challenging as the number of programs in our technology rich marketplace increases dramatically. Purchasing titles for entertainment is much less complicated than selecting effective educational materials based upon sound instructional objectives through a systematic review of characteristics of learner and learning environment. This study was designed to investigate the software selection process engaged in by special education teachers. Questionnaires were completed by 144 respondents with a return rate of 69% to (a) identify characteristics perceived as important to consider when determining which programs to select for use by students with high incidence disabilities, and (b) ascertain a list of software titles used in special education classrooms currently. Based upon qualitative data analysis, results indicated ten themes inservice teachers consider when selecting software titles. Those themes include: (a) welcoming; (b) sensory stimulating; (c) learner program design; (d) learner empowerment; (e) technology adaptation; (f ) diversity; (g) individual instructional integration; (h) narration; (i) curriculum encompassing; and (j) teacher functionality. Additionally this paper provides a list of software titles used in classrooms currently and describes implications for integrating a software evaluation component into a methods course. (Contains 2 tables.) |
| Abstractor: | Author |
| Number of References: | 33 |
| Entry Date: | 2008 |
| Access URL: | https://www.tese.org/ |
| Accession Number: | EJ789095 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| Abstract: | For most experienced educators, choosing software for children with disabilities is challenging as the number of programs in our technology rich marketplace increases dramatically. Purchasing titles for entertainment is much less complicated than selecting effective educational materials based upon sound instructional objectives through a systematic review of characteristics of learner and learning environment. This study was designed to investigate the software selection process engaged in by special education teachers. Questionnaires were completed by 144 respondents with a return rate of 69% to (a) identify characteristics perceived as important to consider when determining which programs to select for use by students with high incidence disabilities, and (b) ascertain a list of software titles used in special education classrooms currently. Based upon qualitative data analysis, results indicated ten themes inservice teachers consider when selecting software titles. Those themes include: (a) welcoming; (b) sensory stimulating; (c) learner program design; (d) learner empowerment; (e) technology adaptation; (f ) diversity; (g) individual instructional integration; (h) narration; (i) curriculum encompassing; and (j) teacher functionality. Additionally this paper provides a list of software titles used in classrooms currently and describes implications for integrating a software evaluation component into a methods course. (Contains 2 tables.) |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0888-4064 |
