A Modified Version of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-II for Cognitive Matching of Infants with and without Down Syndrome

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: A Modified Version of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-II for Cognitive Matching of Infants with and without Down Syndrome
Language: English
Authors: Moore, D. G., Goodwin, J. E., Oates, J. M.
Source: Journal of Intellectual Disability Research. Jun 2008 52(6):554-561.
Availability: Blackwell Publishing. 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148. Tel: 800-835-6770; Tel: 781-388-8599; Fax: 781-388-8232; e-mail: customerservices@blackwellpublishing.com; Web site: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/jnl_default.asp
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 8
Publication Date: 2008
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Down Syndrome, Infants, Cognitive Development, Cognitive Ability, Test Items, Measures (Individuals)
Assessment and Survey Identifiers: Bayley Scales of Infant Development
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2008.01064.x
ISSN: 0964-2633
Abstract: Background: Many measures of infants' early cognitive development, including the BSID-II (The Bayley Scales of Infant Development), mix together test items that assess a number of different developmental domains including language, attention, motor functioning and social abilities, and some items contribute to the assessment of more than one domain. Consequently, the scales may lead to under- or over-estimates of cognitive abilities in some clinical samples and may not be the best measure to use for matching purposes. Method: To address this issue we created a modified form of the BSID-II (the BSID-M) to provide a "purer" assessment of the general cognitive capacities in infants with Down syndrome (DS) from 6 to 18 months of age. We excluded a number of items that implicated language, motor, attentional and social functioning from the original measure. This modified form was administered to 17 infants with Down syndrome when 6, 12 and 18 months old and to 41 typically developing infants at 4, 7 and 10 months old. Results: The results suggested that the modified form continued to provide a meaningful and stable measure of cognitive functioning and revealed that DS infants may score marginally higher in terms of general cognitive abilities when using this modified form than they might when using the standard BSID-II scales. Conclusions: This modified form may be useful for researchers who need a "purer" measure with which to match infants with DS and other infants with intellectual disabilities on cognitive functioning.
Abstractor: Author
Number of References: 14
Entry Date: 2008
Accession Number: EJ794441
Database: ERIC
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:Background: Many measures of infants' early cognitive development, including the BSID-II (The Bayley Scales of Infant Development), mix together test items that assess a number of different developmental domains including language, attention, motor functioning and social abilities, and some items contribute to the assessment of more than one domain. Consequently, the scales may lead to under- or over-estimates of cognitive abilities in some clinical samples and may not be the best measure to use for matching purposes. Method: To address this issue we created a modified form of the BSID-II (the BSID-M) to provide a "purer" assessment of the general cognitive capacities in infants with Down syndrome (DS) from 6 to 18 months of age. We excluded a number of items that implicated language, motor, attentional and social functioning from the original measure. This modified form was administered to 17 infants with Down syndrome when 6, 12 and 18 months old and to 41 typically developing infants at 4, 7 and 10 months old. Results: The results suggested that the modified form continued to provide a meaningful and stable measure of cognitive functioning and revealed that DS infants may score marginally higher in terms of general cognitive abilities when using this modified form than they might when using the standard BSID-II scales. Conclusions: This modified form may be useful for researchers who need a "purer" measure with which to match infants with DS and other infants with intellectual disabilities on cognitive functioning.
ISSN:0964-2633
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2008.01064.x