Paved with Good Intentions: Rethinking the Ethics of ELSI Research
Saved in:
| Title: | Paved with Good Intentions: Rethinking the Ethics of ELSI Research |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Seltzer, Daniel, Zoloth, Laurie, Traina, Cristina L. H. |
| Source: | Journal of Research Administration. Fall 2011 42(2):15-24. |
| Availability: | Society of Research Administrators International. 500 North Washington Street Suite 300, Falls Church, VA 22046. Tel: 703-741-0140; Fax: 703-741-0142; e-mail: membership@srainternational.org; Web site: http://www.srainternational.org |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Physical Description: | |
| Page Count: | 10 |
| Publication Date: | 2011 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Descriptive |
| Descriptors: | Scientific Research, Integrity, Economic Climate, Ethics, Humanities, Legal Responsibility, Social Influences, Grants, Researchers, Moral Values, Financial Support, Conflict of Interest, Administrator Role, Research Administration, Research Directors, Research Projects |
| ISSN: | 1539-1590 |
| Abstract: | Ethical, Legal and Social Implications ("ELSI") research has played an increasingly important role in scientific research. Tens of millions of dollars, many of which are public, are spent funding scientific research projects. Taxpayers are demanding that scientific advancement move forward, hand-in-hand with careful examination of the many ethical and social issues that are raised by the emerging sciences. It is not uncommon to find grants that include ELSI components. This raises a potential problem relating to the ability of ethicists to undertake serious, objective reflection and make independent, normative suggestions. If the Principal Investigator (PI) of the grant controls the funding of the ethics component and ELSI reflection suggests acts or omissions that would negatively affect the PI's scientific project, especially given the current economic climate in which reductions in ethics and humanities funding jeopardize other employment, ethicists may be placed in a position of having to decide between seriously jeopardizing their career, or ignoring the moral problem and compromising their professional integrity. One suggestion to avoid this conflict is to separate the funding of ELSI components from the scientific portion of the grant and to erect a secure firewall between the two. Other solutions certainly exist, and the purpose of this paper is to raise the issue to stimulate debate. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Number of References: | 9 |
| Entry Date: | 2012 |
| Access URL: | https://www.srainternational.org/sra03/template/tntbjour.cfm?id=3010 |
| Accession Number: | EJ955018 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| Abstract: | Ethical, Legal and Social Implications ("ELSI") research has played an increasingly important role in scientific research. Tens of millions of dollars, many of which are public, are spent funding scientific research projects. Taxpayers are demanding that scientific advancement move forward, hand-in-hand with careful examination of the many ethical and social issues that are raised by the emerging sciences. It is not uncommon to find grants that include ELSI components. This raises a potential problem relating to the ability of ethicists to undertake serious, objective reflection and make independent, normative suggestions. If the Principal Investigator (PI) of the grant controls the funding of the ethics component and ELSI reflection suggests acts or omissions that would negatively affect the PI's scientific project, especially given the current economic climate in which reductions in ethics and humanities funding jeopardize other employment, ethicists may be placed in a position of having to decide between seriously jeopardizing their career, or ignoring the moral problem and compromising their professional integrity. One suggestion to avoid this conflict is to separate the funding of ELSI components from the scientific portion of the grant and to erect a secure firewall between the two. Other solutions certainly exist, and the purpose of this paper is to raise the issue to stimulate debate. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1539-1590 |
