View in EDS

A randomized comparison of two-stage versus traditional one-stage consent for a low-stakes randomized trial.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: A randomized comparison of two-stage versus traditional one-stage consent for a low-stakes randomized trial.
Authors: Vickers AJ; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA., Vertosick EA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA., Austria M; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA., Gaffney CD; Department of Surgery (Urology Service), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA., Carlsson SV; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.; Department of Surgery (Urology Service), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.; Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden., Kim SY; Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA., Ehdaie B; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Source: Clinical trials (London, England) [Clin Trials] 2023 Dec; Vol. 20 (6), pp. 642-648. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Jul 04.
Publication Type: Randomized Controlled Trial; Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Info: Publisher: SAGE Publications Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101197451 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1740-7753 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 17407745 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Clin Trials Subsets: MEDLINE
Database: MEDLINE Ultimate
Description
ISSN:1740-7753
DOI:10.1177/17407745231185058