Comparison of statistical methods for the analysis of patient-reported outcomes (PROs), particularly the Short-Form 36 (SF-36), in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) using standardised effect size (SES): an empirical analysis.
Saved in:
| Title: | Comparison of statistical methods for the analysis of patient-reported outcomes (PROs), particularly the Short-Form 36 (SF-36), in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) using standardised effect size (SES): an empirical analysis. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Qian Y; Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK. yirui.qian@york.ac.uk., Walters SJ; Division of Population Health, School of Medicine & Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK., Jacques RM; Division of Population Health, School of Medicine & Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK., Flight L; Division of Population Health, School of Medicine & Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. |
| Source: | Health and quality of life outcomes [Health Qual Life Outcomes] 2025 Apr 29; Vol. 23 (1), pp. 45. Date of Electronic Publication: 2025 Apr 29. |
| Publication Type: | Journal Article; Comparative Study |
| Journal Info: | Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101153626 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1477-7525 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14777525 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Health Qual Life Outcomes Subsets: MEDLINE |
| Database: | MEDLINE Ultimate |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| ISSN: | 1477-7525 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1186/s12955-025-02373-z |
