APA (7th ed.) Citation

Y, Q., SJ, W., RM, J., & L, F. (2025). Comparison of statistical methods for the analysis of patient-reported outcomes (PROs), particularly the Short-Form 36 (SF-36), in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) using standardised effect size (SES): An empirical analysis. Health and quality of life outcomes, 23(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-025-02373-z

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Y, Qian, Walters SJ, Jacques RM, and Flight L. "Comparison of Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Patient-reported Outcomes (PROs), Particularly the Short-Form 36 (SF-36), in Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) Using Standardised Effect Size (SES): An Empirical Analysis." Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 23, no. 1 (2025): 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-025-02373-z.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Y, Qian, et al. "Comparison of Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Patient-reported Outcomes (PROs), Particularly the Short-Form 36 (SF-36), in Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) Using Standardised Effect Size (SES): An Empirical Analysis." Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, vol. 23, no. 1, 2025, p. 45, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-025-02373-z.