Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing interrupted sutures versus knotless barbed sutures.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing interrupted sutures versus knotless barbed sutures.
Authors: Moqbel I; Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt., Ghonaim MM; Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt., Hussein Abdelbaset A; Al-Azhar Faculty of Medicine, New Damietta, Egypt., Moawad WM; Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, El Fayoum, Egypt., Samy Gad A; Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt., Mohamed A; Burjeel Medical City, Abu Dhabi, UAE., Eladawi S; Faculty of Medicine, New Giza University, Giza, Egypt., Abdelmonem Elsayed A; General Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Source: Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology [Scand J Gastroenterol] 2026 Jan; Vol. 61 (1), pp. 73-83. Date of Electronic Publication: 2025 Dec 04.
Publication Type: Journal Article; Systematic Review; Meta-Analysis; Comparative Study
Journal Info: Publisher: Informa Healthcare Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 0060105 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1502-7708 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00365521 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Scand J Gastroenterol Subsets: MEDLINE
Database: MEDLINE Ultimate
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
ISSN:1502-7708
DOI:10.1080/00365521.2025.2594786