Randomised controlled trial of nasal ventilation in acute ventilatory failure due to chronic obstructive airways disease.
Saved in:
| Title: | Randomised controlled trial of nasal ventilation in acute ventilatory failure due to chronic obstructive airways disease. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Bott J (AUTHOR), Carroll MP (AUTHOR), Conway JH (AUTHOR), Keilty SEJ (AUTHOR), Ward EM (AUTHOR), Brown AM (AUTHOR), Paul EA (AUTHOR), Elliott MW (AUTHOR), Godfrey RC (AUTHOR), Wedzicha JA (AUTHOR), Moxham J (AUTHOR), Bott, J (AUTHOR), Carroll, M P (AUTHOR), Conway, J H (AUTHOR), Keilty, S E (AUTHOR), Ward, E M (AUTHOR), Brown, A M (AUTHOR), Paul, E A (AUTHOR), Elliott, M W (AUTHOR), Godfrey, R C (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Lancet. 6/19/1993, Vol. 341 Issue 8860, p1555-1557. 3p. |
| Abstract: | Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive airways disease (COAD) are a common cause of admission to hospital, and have a high mortality. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) has been used successfully in patients with respiratory failure due to neuromuscular and skeletal disorders, but the outcome of treatment in patients with COAD is less well known. We carried out a prospective randomised controlled trial of conventional treatment versus conventional treatment plus NIPPV, in 60 patients with acute ventilatory failure due to exacerbations of COAD. For the NIPPV group there was a rise in pH, compared with a fall in the controls (mean difference of change between the groups 0.046 [95% CI 0.06-0.02, p < 0.001]), and a larger fall in PaCO2 (mean difference in change between the groups 1.2 kPa [95% CI 0.45 to 2.03, p < 0.01]). Median visual analogue scores over the first 3 days of admission showed less breathlessness in the NIPPV group (2.3 cm [range 0.1-5.5]) than in the control group (4.5 cm [range 0.9-8.8]) (p < 0.025). Survival rates at 30 days were compared for intention-to-treat and efficacy populations. In the efficacy mortality comparison, mortality in the NIPPV group was reduced: 1/26 vs 9/30 (relative risk = 0.13, CI = 0.02-0.95, p = 0.014). This effect was less in the intention-to-treat analysis: 3/30 vs 9/30 (relative risk = 0.33, CI = 0.10-1.11, p = 0.106). In patients with acute ventilatory failure due to COAD who received NIPPV there was a significant rise in pH, a reduction in PaCO2 and breathlessness, and reduced mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Lancet is the property of Lancet and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive airways disease (COAD) are a common cause of admission to hospital, and have a high mortality. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) has been used successfully in patients with respiratory failure due to neuromuscular and skeletal disorders, but the outcome of treatment in patients with COAD is less well known. We carried out a prospective randomised controlled trial of conventional treatment versus conventional treatment plus NIPPV, in 60 patients with acute ventilatory failure due to exacerbations of COAD. For the NIPPV group there was a rise in pH, compared with a fall in the controls (mean difference of change between the groups 0.046 [95% CI 0.06-0.02, p < 0.001]), and a larger fall in PaCO2 (mean difference in change between the groups 1.2 kPa [95% CI 0.45 to 2.03, p < 0.01]). Median visual analogue scores over the first 3 days of admission showed less breathlessness in the NIPPV group (2.3 cm [range 0.1-5.5]) than in the control group (4.5 cm [range 0.9-8.8]) (p < 0.025). Survival rates at 30 days were compared for intention-to-treat and efficacy populations. In the efficacy mortality comparison, mortality in the NIPPV group was reduced: 1/26 vs 9/30 (relative risk = 0.13, CI = 0.02-0.95, p = 0.014). This effect was less in the intention-to-treat analysis: 3/30 vs 9/30 (relative risk = 0.33, CI = 0.10-1.11, p = 0.106). In patients with acute ventilatory failure due to COAD who received NIPPV there was a significant rise in pH, a reduction in PaCO2 and breathlessness, and reduced mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 01406736 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90696-e |
