View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Acting in solidarity: Testing an extended dual pathway model of collective action by bystander group members.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Acting in solidarity: Testing an extended dual pathway model of collective action by bystander group members.
Authors: Saab, Rim, Tausch, Nicole, Spears, Russell, Cheung, Wing‐Yee
Source: British Journal of Social Psychology. Sep2015, Vol. 54 Issue 3, p539-560. 22p. 2 Diagrams, 6 Charts.
Subjects: Attitude (Psychology), Chi-squared test, Confidence intervals, Statistical correlation, Ethics, Factor analysis, Group identity, Mathematical models, Path analysis (Statistics), Political participation, Probability theory, Scale analysis (Psychology), Social change, Social psychology, Social skills, Surveys, Theory, Group process, Maximum likelihood statistics, Cross-sectional method, Data analysis software, Medical coding, Descriptive statistics
Geographic Terms: Hong Kong (China), England
Abstract: We examined predictors of collective action among bystander group members in solidarity with a disadvantaged group by extending the dual pathway model of collective action, which proposes one efficacy-based and one emotion-based path to collective action (Van Zomeren, Spears, Fischer, & Leach, 2004). Based on two proposed functions of social identity performance (Klein, Spears, & Reicher, 2007), we distinguished between the efficacy of collective action at consolidating the identity of a protest movement and its efficacy at achieving social change (political efficacy). We expected identity consolidation efficacy to positively predict collective action tendencies directly and indirectly via political efficacy. We also expected collective action tendencies to be positively predicted by moral outrage and by sympathy in response to disadvantaged outgroup's suffering. These hypotheses were supported in two surveys examining intentions to protest for Palestine in Britain (Study 1), and intentions to attend the June 4th vigil in Hong Kong to commemorate the Tiananmen massacre among a sample of Hong Kong citizens (Study 2). The contributions of these findings to research on the dual pathway model of collective action and the different functions of collective action are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of British Journal of Social Psychology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 109323696
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Acting in solidarity: Testing an extended dual pathway model of collective action by bystander group members.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Saab%2C+Rim%22">Saab, Rim</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Tausch%2C+Nicole%22">Tausch, Nicole</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Spears%2C+Russell%22">Spears, Russell</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cheung%2C+Wing‐Yee%22">Cheung, Wing‐Yee</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22British+Journal+of+Social+Psychology%22">British Journal of Social Psychology</searchLink>. Sep2015, Vol. 54 Issue 3, p539-560. 22p. 2 Diagrams, 6 Charts.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Attitude+%28Psychology%29%22">Attitude (Psychology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Chi-squared+test%22">Chi-squared test</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Confidence+intervals%22">Confidence intervals</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+correlation%22">Statistical correlation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ethics%22">Ethics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Factor+analysis%22">Factor analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Group+identity%22">Group identity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mathematical+models%22">Mathematical models</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Path+analysis+%28Statistics%29%22">Path analysis (Statistics)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Political+participation%22">Political participation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Probability+theory%22">Probability theory</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scale+analysis+%28Psychology%29%22">Scale analysis (Psychology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+change%22">Social change</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+psychology%22">Social psychology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+skills%22">Social skills</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Surveys%22">Surveys</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Theory%22">Theory</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Group+process%22">Group process</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Maximum+likelihood+statistics%22">Maximum likelihood statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cross-sectional+method%22">Cross-sectional method</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+analysis+software%22">Data analysis software</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+coding%22">Medical coding</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Descriptive+statistics%22">Descriptive statistics</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectGeographic
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Hong+Kong+%28China%29%22">Hong Kong (China)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22England%22">England</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: We examined predictors of collective action among bystander group members in solidarity with a disadvantaged group by extending the dual pathway model of collective action, which proposes one efficacy-based and one emotion-based path to collective action (Van Zomeren, Spears, Fischer, & Leach, 2004). Based on two proposed functions of social identity performance (Klein, Spears, & Reicher, 2007), we distinguished between the efficacy of collective action at consolidating the identity of a protest movement and its efficacy at achieving social change (political efficacy). We expected identity consolidation efficacy to positively predict collective action tendencies directly and indirectly via political efficacy. We also expected collective action tendencies to be positively predicted by moral outrage and by sympathy in response to disadvantaged outgroup's suffering. These hypotheses were supported in two surveys examining intentions to protest for Palestine in Britain (Study 1), and intentions to attend the June 4th vigil in Hong Kong to commemorate the Tiananmen massacre among a sample of Hong Kong citizens (Study 2). The contributions of these findings to research on the dual pathway model of collective action and the different functions of collective action are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of British Journal of Social Psychology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=109323696
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1111/bjso.12095
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 22
        StartPage: 539
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Attitude (Psychology)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Chi-squared test
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Confidence intervals
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Statistical correlation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Ethics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Factor analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Group identity
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Mathematical models
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Path analysis (Statistics)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Political participation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Probability theory
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Scale analysis (Psychology)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Social change
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Social psychology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Social skills
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Surveys
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Theory
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Group process
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Maximum likelihood statistics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cross-sectional method
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Data analysis software
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Medical coding
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Hong Kong (China)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: England
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Acting in solidarity: Testing an extended dual pathway model of collective action by bystander group members.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Saab, Rim
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Tausch, Nicole
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Spears, Russell
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Cheung, Wing‐Yee
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 09
              Text: Sep2015
              Type: published
              Y: 2015
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 01446665
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 54
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: British Journal of Social Psychology
              Type: main
ResultId 1