Quitting smoking: The importance of non-smoker identity in predicting smoking behaviour and responses to a smoking ban.
Saved in:
| Title: | Quitting smoking: The importance of non-smoker identity in predicting smoking behaviour and responses to a smoking ban. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Meijer, Eline (AUTHOR), Gebhardt, Winifred A. (AUTHOR), Dijkstra, Arie (AUTHOR), Willemsen, Marc C. (AUTHOR), Van Laar, Colette (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Psychology & Health. Dec2015, Vol. 30 Issue 12, p1387-1409. 23p. 6 Charts, 1 Graph. |
| Subjects: | Smoking prevention, Smoking, Attitude (Psychology), Confidence intervals, Group identity, Health behavior, Health facility administration, Intention, Internet, Longitudinal method, Probability theory, Psychological tests, Questionnaires, Regression analysis, Research funding, Smoking cessation, Surveys, Logistic regression analysis, Socioeconomic factors, Data analysis software, Descriptive statistics |
| Geographic Terms: | Netherlands |
| Abstract: | Objective: We examined how ‘smoker’ and ‘non-smoker’ self- and group-identities and socio-economic status (SES) may predict smoking behaviour and responses to antismoking measures (i.e. the Dutch smoking ban in hospitality venues). We validated a measure of responses to the smoking ban. Design: Longitudinal online survey study with one-year follow-up (N = 623 at T1 in 2011;N = 188 at T2 in 2012) among daily smokers. Main outcome measures: Intention to quit, quit attempts and ‘rejecting’, ‘victimizing’, ‘socially conscious smoking’ and ‘active quitting’ responses to the smoking ban. Results: Non-smoker identities are more important than smoker identities in predicting intention to quit, quit attempts and responses to the smoking ban, even when controlling for other important predictors such as nicotine dependence. Smokers with stronger non-smoker identities had stronger intentions to quit, were more likely to attempt to quit between measurements, and showed less negative and more positive responses to the smoking ban. The association between non-smoker self-identity and intention to quit was stronger among smokers with lower than higher SES. Conclusion: Antismoking measures might be more effective if they would focus also on the identity of smokers, and help smokers to increase identification with non-smoking and non-smokers. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER] |
| Copyright of Psychology & Health is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Objective: We examined how ‘smoker’ and ‘non-smoker’ self- and group-identities and socio-economic status (SES) may predict smoking behaviour and responses to antismoking measures (i.e. the Dutch smoking ban in hospitality venues). We validated a measure of responses to the smoking ban. Design: Longitudinal online survey study with one-year follow-up (N = 623 at T1 in 2011;N = 188 at T2 in 2012) among daily smokers. Main outcome measures: Intention to quit, quit attempts and ‘rejecting’, ‘victimizing’, ‘socially conscious smoking’ and ‘active quitting’ responses to the smoking ban. Results: Non-smoker identities are more important than smoker identities in predicting intention to quit, quit attempts and responses to the smoking ban, even when controlling for other important predictors such as nicotine dependence. Smokers with stronger non-smoker identities had stronger intentions to quit, were more likely to attempt to quit between measurements, and showed less negative and more positive responses to the smoking ban. The association between non-smoker self-identity and intention to quit was stronger among smokers with lower than higher SES. Conclusion: Antismoking measures might be more effective if they would focus also on the identity of smokers, and help smokers to increase identification with non-smoking and non-smokers. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 08870446 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/08870446.2015.1049603 |
