Theory of mind selectively predicts preschoolers' knowledge-based selective word learning.
Saved in:
| Title: | Theory of mind selectively predicts preschoolers' knowledge-based selective word learning. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Brosseau‐Liard, Patricia, Penney, Danielle, Poulin‐Dubois, Diane |
| Source: | British Journal of Developmental Psychology. Nov2015, Vol. 33 Issue 4, p464-475. 12p. |
| Subjects: | Cognition in children, Social learning, Language acquisition, Social perception in children, Linguistic informants, Preschool children, Early childhood education, Analysis of covariance, Intellect, Theory of knowledge, Learning, Research funding, T-test (Statistics), Thought & thinking, Multiple regression analysis, Descriptive statistics |
| Abstract: | Children can selectively attend to various attributes of a model, such as past accuracy or physical strength, to guide their social learning. There is a debate regarding whether a relation exists between theory‐of‐mind skills and selective learning. We hypothesized that high performance on theory‐of‐mind tasks would predict preference for learning new words from accurate informants (an epistemic attribute), but not from physically strong informants (a non‐epistemic attribute). Three‐ and 4‐year‐olds (N = 65) completed two selective learning tasks, and their theory‐of‐mind abilities were assessed. As expected, performance on a theory‐of‐mind battery predicted children's preference to learn from more accurate informants but not from physically stronger informants. Results thus suggest that preschoolers with more advanced theory of mind have a better understanding of knowledge and apply that understanding to guide their selection of informants. This work has important implications for research on children's developing social cognition and early learning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of British Journal of Developmental Psychology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Children can selectively attend to various attributes of a model, such as past accuracy or physical strength, to guide their social learning. There is a debate regarding whether a relation exists between theory‐of‐mind skills and selective learning. We hypothesized that high performance on theory‐of‐mind tasks would predict preference for learning new words from accurate informants (an epistemic attribute), but not from physically strong informants (a non‐epistemic attribute). Three‐ and 4‐year‐olds (N = 65) completed two selective learning tasks, and their theory‐of‐mind abilities were assessed. As expected, performance on a theory‐of‐mind battery predicted children's preference to learn from more accurate informants but not from physically stronger informants. Results thus suggest that preschoolers with more advanced theory of mind have a better understanding of knowledge and apply that understanding to guide their selection of informants. This work has important implications for research on children's developing social cognition and early learning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0261510X |
| DOI: | 10.1111/bjdp.12107 |
