Psychometric properties of the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory: an item response theory approach.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Psychometric properties of the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory: an item response theory approach.
Authors: Costa, Daniel S. J., Dieng, Mbathio, Cust, Anne E., Butow, Phyllis N., Kasparian, Nadine A.
Source: Psycho-Oncology. Jul2016, Vol. 25 Issue 7, p832-838. 7p. 1 Diagram, 2 Charts, 1 Graph.
Subjects: Psychometrics, Fear of cancer, Melanoma, Item response theory, Generalizability theory, Adaptability (Personality), Comparative studies, Fear, Research methodology, Medical cooperation, Phobias, Research, Research evaluation, Evaluation research, Psychology
Abstract: Objective: Classical psychometric methods have been used to demonstrate the validity and reliability of the 42-item Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory (FCRI). Our aim was to expand on this evidence with information on the discriminative value of the individual items when administered to people with a personal history of melanoma, using an item response theory (IRT) approach.Methods: We used a two-parameter IRT model to examine all items of the FCRI, primarily regarding whether people with a personal history of melanoma use the response scale as expected (as indicated by item characteristic curves), and whether the items can discriminate between those low and high on the constructs assessed by the instrument.Results: The sample was comprised of 286 adults with a personal history of melanoma (58% male, mean age: 59.1 years). The established factor structure of the FCRI was generally confirmed. IRT highlighted several items with problematic item characteristic curves, including most items in the Reassurance and Coping Strategies domains. Several other items exhibited poor discrimination.Conclusions: Based on this IRT analysis, we outline suggestions for refinement of the FCRI and potential development of a short-form, that could reduce respondent burden. Generalisability of these findings beyond melanoma warrants further examination. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Psycho-Oncology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Description
Abstract:<bold>Objective: </bold>Classical psychometric methods have been used to demonstrate the validity and reliability of the 42-item Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory (FCRI). Our aim was to expand on this evidence with information on the discriminative value of the individual items when administered to people with a personal history of melanoma, using an item response theory (IRT) approach.<bold>Methods: </bold>We used a two-parameter IRT model to examine all items of the FCRI, primarily regarding whether people with a personal history of melanoma use the response scale as expected (as indicated by item characteristic curves), and whether the items can discriminate between those low and high on the constructs assessed by the instrument.<bold>Results: </bold>The sample was comprised of 286 adults with a personal history of melanoma (58% male, mean age: 59.1 years). The established factor structure of the FCRI was generally confirmed. IRT highlighted several items with problematic item characteristic curves, including most items in the Reassurance and Coping Strategies domains. Several other items exhibited poor discrimination.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>Based on this IRT analysis, we outline suggestions for refinement of the FCRI and potential development of a short-form, that could reduce respondent burden. Generalisability of these findings beyond melanoma warrants further examination. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:10579249
DOI:10.1002/pon.4018