Prognostic parameters and outcome after re-irradiation for progressive glioblastoma.
Saved in:
| Title: | Prognostic parameters and outcome after re-irradiation for progressive glioblastoma. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Zwirner, K., Paulsen, F., Schittenhelm, J., Borchers, C., Skardelly, M., Zips, D., Eckert, F. |
| Source: | Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. Sep2017, Vol. 136 Issue 3, p239-245. 7p. |
| Subjects: | Glioblastoma multiforme, Medical protocols, Radiosurgery, Cancer radiotherapy, Tumor growth, Prognosis |
| Abstract: | Objectives In progressive glioblastoma, salvage treatment remains unstandardized, response is highly variable, and detailed analysis of individual approaches is mandatory. Re-irradiation is an established option in the therapy of progressive glioblastoma. Thus, we analysed outcome and prognostic parameters of patients with re-irradiated glioblastoma treated at our institution since 1998. Materials and methods In a total of 51 patients, clinical and treatment parameters were collected and analysed retrospectively. Re-irradiation protocols included radiosurgery, hypofractionated radiotherapy or normofractionated radiotherapy. Outcome was analysed regarding prognostic factors in this highly selected cohort. Results Median overall survival after primary diagnosis was 28.8 months. Patients re-irradiated with single-dose stereotactic radiosurgery or hypofractionated regimes showed a superior overall survival after primary diagnosis compared to normofractionated treatment. Positive prognostic factors included a smaller gross tumour volume and younger age. A methylated MGMT promoter approached statistical significance as a positive factor regarding overall survival after re-irradiation. Further well-known prognostic factors as extension of the initial resection and the concomitance of temozolomide with the initial radiation treatment only appeared relevant in a subgroup of four long-term survivors. Conclusions The favourable results regarding overall survival are probably due to patient selection for re-irradiation. If technically feasible, stereotactic radiosurgery or hypofractionated regimes should be preferred. In this highly selected re-irradiation cohort, only some of the well-known prognostic factors of the primary tumour setting were found to influence overall survival significantly. In contrast, also some patients presenting with unfavourable predictive parameters showed an encouraging course of disease and thus should not be excluded from re-irradiation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Acta Neurologica Scandinavica is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Objectives In progressive glioblastoma, salvage treatment remains unstandardized, response is highly variable, and detailed analysis of individual approaches is mandatory. Re-irradiation is an established option in the therapy of progressive glioblastoma. Thus, we analysed outcome and prognostic parameters of patients with re-irradiated glioblastoma treated at our institution since 1998. Materials and methods In a total of 51 patients, clinical and treatment parameters were collected and analysed retrospectively. Re-irradiation protocols included radiosurgery, hypofractionated radiotherapy or normofractionated radiotherapy. Outcome was analysed regarding prognostic factors in this highly selected cohort. Results Median overall survival after primary diagnosis was 28.8 months. Patients re-irradiated with single-dose stereotactic radiosurgery or hypofractionated regimes showed a superior overall survival after primary diagnosis compared to normofractionated treatment. Positive prognostic factors included a smaller gross tumour volume and younger age. A methylated MGMT promoter approached statistical significance as a positive factor regarding overall survival after re-irradiation. Further well-known prognostic factors as extension of the initial resection and the concomitance of temozolomide with the initial radiation treatment only appeared relevant in a subgroup of four long-term survivors. Conclusions The favourable results regarding overall survival are probably due to patient selection for re-irradiation. If technically feasible, stereotactic radiosurgery or hypofractionated regimes should be preferred. In this highly selected re-irradiation cohort, only some of the well-known prognostic factors of the primary tumour setting were found to influence overall survival significantly. In contrast, also some patients presenting with unfavourable predictive parameters showed an encouraging course of disease and thus should not be excluded from re-irradiation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 00016314 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/ane.12719 |
