Children's and Adolescents' Evaluations of Intergroup Exclusion in Interracial and Interwealth Peer Contexts.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Children's and Adolescents' Evaluations of Intergroup Exclusion in Interracial and Interwealth Peer Contexts.
Authors: Burkholder, Amanda R. (AUTHOR), Elenbaas, Laura (AUTHOR), Killen, Melanie (AUTHOR)
Source: Child Development. Mar/Apr2020, Vol. 91 Issue 2, pe512-e527. 16p. 1 Chart, 4 Graphs.
Subjects: Intergroup relations, Peer pressure, Social isolation, Interracial friendship, Wealth
Abstract: Children and adolescents (N = 153, ages 8-14 years, Mage  = 11.46 years) predicted and evaluated peer exclusion in interwealth (high-wealth and low-wealth) and interracial (African American and European American) contexts. With age, participants increasingly expected high-wealth groups to be more exclusive than low-wealth groups, regardless of their depicted race. Furthermore, children evaluated interwealth exclusion less negatively than interracial exclusion, and children who identified as higher in wealth evaluated interwealth exclusion less negatively than did children who identified as lower in wealth. Children cited explicit negative stereotypes about high-wealth groups in their justifications, while rarely citing stereotypes about low-wealth groups or racial groups. Results revealed that both race and wealth are important factors that children consider when evaluating peer exclusion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Child Development is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:Children and adolescents (N = 153, ages 8-14 years, Mage  = 11.46 years) predicted and evaluated peer exclusion in interwealth (high-wealth and low-wealth) and interracial (African American and European American) contexts. With age, participants increasingly expected high-wealth groups to be more exclusive than low-wealth groups, regardless of their depicted race. Furthermore, children evaluated interwealth exclusion less negatively than interracial exclusion, and children who identified as higher in wealth evaluated interwealth exclusion less negatively than did children who identified as lower in wealth. Children cited explicit negative stereotypes about high-wealth groups in their justifications, while rarely citing stereotypes about low-wealth groups or racial groups. Results revealed that both race and wealth are important factors that children consider when evaluating peer exclusion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:00093920
DOI:10.1111/cdev.13249