Dissociative disorders: a personal 'work in progress'.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Dissociative disorders: a personal 'work in progress'.
Authors: Middleton, Warwick
Source: Australasian Psychiatry. Sep2004, Vol. 12 Issue 3, p245-252. 8p.
Subjects: Dissociative disorders, Dissociation (Psychology), Pathological psychology, Psychotherapy patients, People with mental illness, Victims
Abstract: Objective: To identify the core issues contained within the dissociative disorders literature, and synthesize them into a non-polarized, inclusive perspective that emphasizes logic, core psychological principles and mutual professional respect.Conclusions: A large percentage of all psychiatric patients are traumatized in clinically significant manners. Dissociation, in all its variants, represents a psychological mechanism for the victim of trauma to defend him/herself from being overwhelmed. Debates regarding the validity of dissociative disorders need to be viewed in the context of society's counter-transference to trauma, in the context of health professionals feeling vulnerable to controversy, and in terms of their own experience of trauma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Australasian Psychiatry is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Description
Abstract:<bold>Objective: </bold>To identify the core issues contained within the dissociative disorders literature, and synthesize them into a non-polarized, inclusive perspective that emphasizes logic, core psychological principles and mutual professional respect.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>A large percentage of all psychiatric patients are traumatized in clinically significant manners. Dissociation, in all its variants, represents a psychological mechanism for the victim of trauma to defend him/herself from being overwhelmed. Debates regarding the validity of dissociative disorders need to be viewed in the context of society's counter-transference to trauma, in the context of health professionals feeling vulnerable to controversy, and in terms of their own experience of trauma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:10398562
DOI:10.1111/j.1039-8562.2004.02108.x