Integration of Well-Being Therapy and Positive Psychotherapy: A Response to Fava and Guidi's (2021) Commentary on Radstaak et al. (2020).

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Integration of Well-Being Therapy and Positive Psychotherapy: A Response to Fava and Guidi's (2021) Commentary on Radstaak et al. (2020).
Authors: Radstaak, Mirjam (AUTHOR), Hüning, Laura (AUTHOR), Bohlmeijer, Ernst T (AUTHOR)
Source: Journal of Traumatic Stress. Apr2021, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p470-471. 2p.
Subjects: Psychotherapy, Post-traumatic stress disorder, Symptoms, Periodical publishing
Abstract: The results of our study on the effects of well-being therapy (WBT) compared with a treatment-as-usual (TAU) control condition among individuals with residual symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) were recently published in the Journal of Traumatic Stress (Radstaak et al., 2020). In a subsequent commentary, Fava and Guidi (2020) raised several conceptual and methodological issues that they asserted potentially limited the interpretation of the results. In this response, we aim to clarify these issues, thus contributing to the optimal interpretation of the findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Traumatic Stress is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Description
Abstract:The results of our study on the effects of well-being therapy (WBT) compared with a treatment-as-usual (TAU) control condition among individuals with residual symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) were recently published in the Journal of Traumatic Stress (Radstaak et al., 2020). In a subsequent commentary, Fava and Guidi (2020) raised several conceptual and methodological issues that they asserted potentially limited the interpretation of the results. In this response, we aim to clarify these issues, thus contributing to the optimal interpretation of the findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:08949867
DOI:10.1002/jts.22671