Ethical Implications of Electroconvulsive Therapy: A Review.

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Title:	Ethical Implications of Electroconvulsive Therapy: A Review.
Authors:	González-Pando, David, González-Menéndez, Ana, Aparicio-Basauri, Víctor, Sanz de la Garza, César Luís, Torracchi-Carrasco, José Esteban, Pérez-Álvarez, Marino
Source:	Ethical Human Psychology & Psychiatry. 2021, Vol. 23 Issue 1, p25-38. 14p.
Subjects:	Electroconvulsive therapy, Medical ethics, Informed consent (Medical law), Patient decision making, Amnesia, Bioethics
Abstract:	This article examines in depth whether electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) satisfies bioethics' four healthcare provision principles: nonmaleficence, beneficence, justice, and autonomy. Treating patients ethically implies protecting them from damages, working to ensure their well-being, and respecting their decisions once they have been correctly informed. Although most of the medical literature states that ECT is an effective and safe technique, there is no conclusive evidence of long-term effectiveness. The frequent and sometimes persistent side effects such as amnesia that imply a profound disturb of lived experience, or the difficulties regarding the informed consent process, allow us to conclude that the bioethical debate about ECT is not currently closed, and the information provided to patients needs to be revised. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
	Copyright of Ethical Human Psychology & Psychiatry is the property of Springer Publishing Company, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database:	Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection

Description
Abstract:	This article examines in depth whether electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) satisfies bioethics' four healthcare provision principles: nonmaleficence, beneficence, justice, and autonomy. Treating patients ethically implies protecting them from damages, working to ensure their well-being, and respecting their decisions once they have been correctly informed. Although most of the medical literature states that ECT is an effective and safe technique, there is no conclusive evidence of long-term effectiveness. The frequent and sometimes persistent side effects such as amnesia that imply a profound disturb of lived experience, or the difficulties regarding the informed consent process, allow us to conclude that the bioethical debate about ECT is not currently closed, and the information provided to patients needs to be revised. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:	15594343
DOI:	10.1891/EHPP-D-21-00002