ConquerFear‐group: Feasibility study with pilot results of a psychological intervention for fear of cancer recurrence delivered in groups.
Saved in:
| Title: | ConquerFear‐group: Feasibility study with pilot results of a psychological intervention for fear of cancer recurrence delivered in groups. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Tauber, Nina M. (AUTHOR), Zachariae, Robert (AUTHOR), Jensen, Anders B. (AUTHOR), Thewes, Belinda (AUTHOR), Skyt, Ina (AUTHOR), Elkjær, Emma (AUTHOR), Butow, Phyllis N. (AUTHOR), O'Toole, Mia S. (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Psycho-Oncology. Jan2022, Vol. 31 Issue 1, p30-38. 9p. 1 Diagram, 2 Charts, 1 Graph. |
| Subjects: | Psychotherapy, Cancer relapse, Feasibility studies, Pilot projects, Psychological distress |
| Abstract: | Objective: ConquerFear has been found to effectively reduce fear of cancer recurrence (FCR). Group interventions may be particularly effective for the treatment of FCR and could lower overall costs. Our objectives were therefore to adapt ConquerFear into a group format (ConquerFear‐Group, CF‐G), and to evaluate its feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy. Methods: Eligible patients had completed treatment for breast cancer 3 months to 5 years previously, were ≥18 years, and scored ≥22 on the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory‐Short Form (FCRI‐SF). The manual was first evaluated with seven patients (Pilot 1), adjusted in accordance with feedback from the patients, therapists, and the original ConquerFear developers. After further evaluation with eight patients (Pilot 2), and subsequent adjustments, the preliminary efficacy of the final manual was evaluated with 27 patients, randomized in blocks to CF‐G (N = 13) or active control (AC) (relaxation training) (N = 14) (Pilot 3). The primary outcome was the FCRI total score. Secondary outcomes included general distress, quality‐of‐life, and process outcomes pertaining to metacognitions, decentering, and worry. All measures were completed at baseline, post‐treatment, and at 3 and 6 months follow‐up. Results: Adjustments of the original ConquerFear manual (Pilot 1 and 2) included changes in the order of treatment components, simplified exercises, and shortened homework. Compared with ACs, CF‐G participants reported greater reductions in FCRI total scores from baseline to post‐treatment (Hedges's g = 0.59, p = 0.004), 3 months (g = 0.50, p = 0.026), and 6 months later (g = 0.93, p = 0.043). Differences corresponding to medium‐to‐large effect sizes (Pilot 3). Although non‐significant, group differences concerning reductions in general distress and maladaptive metacognitions corresponded to small‐to‐medium effect sizes (g = 0.40–0.61; ps = 0.40–0.61). Conclusions: CF‐G appears feasible and potentially efficacious in treating FCR in a breast cancer population. These preliminary results are promising but need to be confirmed in a larger randomized trial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Psycho-Oncology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Objective: ConquerFear has been found to effectively reduce fear of cancer recurrence (FCR). Group interventions may be particularly effective for the treatment of FCR and could lower overall costs. Our objectives were therefore to adapt ConquerFear into a group format (ConquerFear‐Group, CF‐G), and to evaluate its feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy. Methods: Eligible patients had completed treatment for breast cancer 3 months to 5 years previously, were ≥18 years, and scored ≥22 on the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory‐Short Form (FCRI‐SF). The manual was first evaluated with seven patients (Pilot 1), adjusted in accordance with feedback from the patients, therapists, and the original ConquerFear developers. After further evaluation with eight patients (Pilot 2), and subsequent adjustments, the preliminary efficacy of the final manual was evaluated with 27 patients, randomized in blocks to CF‐G (N = 13) or active control (AC) (relaxation training) (N = 14) (Pilot 3). The primary outcome was the FCRI total score. Secondary outcomes included general distress, quality‐of‐life, and process outcomes pertaining to metacognitions, decentering, and worry. All measures were completed at baseline, post‐treatment, and at 3 and 6 months follow‐up. Results: Adjustments of the original ConquerFear manual (Pilot 1 and 2) included changes in the order of treatment components, simplified exercises, and shortened homework. Compared with ACs, CF‐G participants reported greater reductions in FCRI total scores from baseline to post‐treatment (Hedges's g = 0.59, p = 0.004), 3 months (g = 0.50, p = 0.026), and 6 months later (g = 0.93, p = 0.043). Differences corresponding to medium‐to‐large effect sizes (Pilot 3). Although non‐significant, group differences concerning reductions in general distress and maladaptive metacognitions corresponded to small‐to‐medium effect sizes (g = 0.40–0.61; ps = 0.40–0.61). Conclusions: CF‐G appears feasible and potentially efficacious in treating FCR in a breast cancer population. These preliminary results are promising but need to be confirmed in a larger randomized trial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 10579249 |
| DOI: | 10.1002/pon.5772 |
