Premature termination of the unified protocol for the transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders: The role of ambivalence towards change.
Saved in:
| Title: | Premature termination of the unified protocol for the transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders: The role of ambivalence towards change. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Oliveira, João Tiago (AUTHOR), Sousa, Inês (AUTHOR), Ribeiro, António P. (AUTHOR), Gonçalves, Miguel M. (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy. May2022, Vol. 29 Issue 3, p1089-1100. 12p. 2 Charts, 2 Graphs. |
| Subjects: | Patient refusal of treatment, Attitude (Psychology), Change, Mathematical models, Patient decision making, Medical protocols, Patients' attitudes, Affective disorders, Theory, Statistical models, Psychotherapy |
| Abstract: | Ambivalence towards change is an expected, recurrent process in psychological change. However, the prolonged experience of ambivalence in psychotherapy contributes to client disengagement, which could result in treatment dropout. Considering the negative effects of premature termination of therapy and the convenience of the identification of clients who are at risk of dropping out before achieving good‐outcome, the current study explored the predictive power of ambivalence for premature therapy termination using a multilevel time‐backwards model (i.e., considering the session of the dropout as session zero and then modelling what occurred from the dropout until session 1). Participants included a total of 96 psychotherapy clients (38 dropouts) treated in a university‐based clinic following the Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders. Multilevel modelling using a time‐backwards model to analyse dropout data provided evidence of the predictive power of ambivalence evolution throughout treatment on the decision to prematurely discontinue treatment (p <.0001; R2adj =.29). Specifically, good‐outcome dropouts presented a decreasing ambivalence trend throughout treatment, whereas poor‐outcome dropouts tended to experience the same levels of ambivalence before deciding to drop out (time × dropout; β11 =.64, p =.014). Additionally, poor‐outcome dropouts presented higher levels of ambivalence (β01 = 9.92, p <.0001) in the last session. The results suggest that the pattern of client ambivalence towards change is a predictor of premature termination of therapy. Implications for clinical and research contexts are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Ambivalence towards change is an expected, recurrent process in psychological change. However, the prolonged experience of ambivalence in psychotherapy contributes to client disengagement, which could result in treatment dropout. Considering the negative effects of premature termination of therapy and the convenience of the identification of clients who are at risk of dropping out before achieving good‐outcome, the current study explored the predictive power of ambivalence for premature therapy termination using a multilevel time‐backwards model (i.e., considering the session of the dropout as session zero and then modelling what occurred from the dropout until session 1). Participants included a total of 96 psychotherapy clients (38 dropouts) treated in a university‐based clinic following the Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders. Multilevel modelling using a time‐backwards model to analyse dropout data provided evidence of the predictive power of ambivalence evolution throughout treatment on the decision to prematurely discontinue treatment (p <.0001; R2adj =.29). Specifically, good‐outcome dropouts presented a decreasing ambivalence trend throughout treatment, whereas poor‐outcome dropouts tended to experience the same levels of ambivalence before deciding to drop out (time × dropout; β11 =.64, p =.014). Additionally, poor‐outcome dropouts presented higher levels of ambivalence (β01 = 9.92, p <.0001) in the last session. The results suggest that the pattern of client ambivalence towards change is a predictor of premature termination of therapy. Implications for clinical and research contexts are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 10633995 |
| DOI: | 10.1002/cpp.2694 |
