How shall we all live together?: Meta‐analytical review of the mutual intercultural relations in plural societies project.
Saved in:
| Title: | How shall we all live together?: Meta‐analytical review of the mutual intercultural relations in plural societies project. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Berry, John W., Lepshokova, Zarina, Grigoryev, Dmitry, Annis, Robert C., Au, Algae K. Y., Bano, Shabana, Boehnke, Klaus, Buholzer, Alois, Brylka, Asteria, Chen, Sylvia Xiaohua, Dandy, Justine, Dunn, Kevin, Van Egmond, Marieke, Galyapina, Victoria, Gibson, Ryan, Grad, Hector, Gui, Yongxia, Hanke, Katja, Jasinskaja‐Lahti, Inga, Kruusvall, Jüri |
| Source: | Applied Psychology: An International Review. Jul2022, Vol. 71 Issue 3, p1014-1041. 28p. |
| Subjects: | Meta-analysis, Acculturation, Practical politics, Cultural pluralism, Interpersonal relations, Psychological adaptation, Religion, Social psychology, Cultural awareness |
| Abstract: | Living together in culturally plural societies poses numerous challenges for members of ethnocultural groups and for the larger society. An important goal of these societies is to achieve positive intercultural relations among all their peoples. Successful management of these relations depends on many factors including a research‐based understanding of the historical, political, economic, religious and psychological features of the groups that are in contact. The core question is 'how we shall we all live together?' In the project reported in this paper (Mutual Intercultural Relations in Plural Societies; MIRIPS), we seek to provide such research by reviewing three core psychological hypotheses of intercultural relations (multiculturalism, contact and integration) in 21 culturally plural societies. The main goal of the project is to evaluate these hypotheses across societies within the MIRIPS project in order to identify if there are some basic psychological principles that underlie intercultural relations panculturally. If there are, the eventual goal is to employ the findings to propose some policies and programmes that may improve the quality of intercultural relationship globally. An internal meta‐analysis using the MIRIPS project data showed that the empirical findings from these societies generally support the validity of the three hypotheses. Implications for the development of policies and programmes to enhance the quality of intercultural relations are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Applied Psychology: An International Review is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Living together in culturally plural societies poses numerous challenges for members of ethnocultural groups and for the larger society. An important goal of these societies is to achieve positive intercultural relations among all their peoples. Successful management of these relations depends on many factors including a research‐based understanding of the historical, political, economic, religious and psychological features of the groups that are in contact. The core question is 'how we shall we all live together?' In the project reported in this paper (Mutual Intercultural Relations in Plural Societies; MIRIPS), we seek to provide such research by reviewing three core psychological hypotheses of intercultural relations (multiculturalism, contact and integration) in 21 culturally plural societies. The main goal of the project is to evaluate these hypotheses across societies within the MIRIPS project in order to identify if there are some basic psychological principles that underlie intercultural relations panculturally. If there are, the eventual goal is to employ the findings to propose some policies and programmes that may improve the quality of intercultural relationship globally. An internal meta‐analysis using the MIRIPS project data showed that the empirical findings from these societies generally support the validity of the three hypotheses. Implications for the development of policies and programmes to enhance the quality of intercultural relations are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0269994X |
| DOI: | 10.1111/apps.12332 |
