Validity and Reliability of the Counseling Center Assessment of Psychological Symptoms‐Japanese Version.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Validity and Reliability of the Counseling Center Assessment of Psychological Symptoms‐Japanese Version.
Authors: Horita, Ryo (AUTHOR), Nishio, Akihiro (AUTHOR), Kawamoto, Aki (AUTHOR), Sado, Tadahiro (AUTHOR), Locke, Benjamin D. (AUTHOR), Yamamoto, Mayumi (AUTHOR)
Source: Japanese Psychological Research. Jan2023, Vol. 65 Issue 1, p9-20. 12p.
Subjects: Psychological tests, Japanese students, Counseling, Test validity, Psychological distress
Abstract: To identify students who are struggling with mental distress and provide them with early and appropriate support, a valid and reliable multidimensional measure is required. The aim of this study was to investigate the convergent validity and the test–retest reliability of the Counseling Center Assessment of Psychological Symptoms‐Japanese (CCAPS‐Japanese). For the validity examination, 1,627 undergraduate students were randomized into five groups. Each group completed one of five questionnaires, comprised of the CCAPS‐Japanese along with one, two, or three validation scales depending on the group. For the reliability examination, a total of 184 and 106 students completed the CCAPS‐Japanese at one‐week and two‐week intervals, respectively. In the validity study, the highest correlation for each CCAPS‐Japanese subscale was found to exist with its referent measure except for the Generalized Anxiety subscale. In the reliability study, correlations for subscale scores at test and retest were significant, ranging from.66 to.88. These findings suggest that the 55‐item CCAPS‐Japanese is applicable for use with Japanese university students. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Japanese Psychological Research is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:To identify students who are struggling with mental distress and provide them with early and appropriate support, a valid and reliable multidimensional measure is required. The aim of this study was to investigate the convergent validity and the test–retest reliability of the Counseling Center Assessment of Psychological Symptoms‐Japanese (CCAPS‐Japanese). For the validity examination, 1,627 undergraduate students were randomized into five groups. Each group completed one of five questionnaires, comprised of the CCAPS‐Japanese along with one, two, or three validation scales depending on the group. For the reliability examination, a total of 184 and 106 students completed the CCAPS‐Japanese at one‐week and two‐week intervals, respectively. In the validity study, the highest correlation for each CCAPS‐Japanese subscale was found to exist with its referent measure except for the Generalized Anxiety subscale. In the reliability study, correlations for subscale scores at test and retest were significant, ranging from.66 to.88. These findings suggest that the 55‐item CCAPS‐Japanese is applicable for use with Japanese university students. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:00215368
DOI:10.1111/jpr.12345