Addressing the ethical and societal challenges posed by genome-wide association studies of behavioral and brain-related traits.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Addressing the ethical and societal challenges posed by genome-wide association studies of behavioral and brain-related traits.
Authors: de Hemptinne, Matthieu C. (AUTHOR), Posthuma, Danielle (AUTHOR)
Source: Nature Neuroscience. Jun2023, Vol. 26 Issue 6, p932-941. 10p.
Abstract: Genome-wide association studies have led to the identification of robust statistical associations of genetic variants with numerous brain-related traits, including neurological and psychiatric conditions, and psychological and behavioral measures. These results may provide insight into the biology underlying these traits and may facilitate clinically useful predictions. However, these results also carry the risk of harm, including possible negative effects of inaccurate predictions, violations of privacy, stigma and genomic discrimination, raising serious ethical and legal implications. Here, we discuss ethical concerns surrounding the results of genome-wide association studies for individuals, society and researchers. Given the success of genome-wide association studies and the increasing availability of nonclinical genomic prediction technologies, better laws and guidelines are urgently needed to regulate the storage, processing and responsible use of genetic data. Also, researchers should be aware of possible misuse of their results, and we provide guidance to help avoid such negative impacts on individuals and society. Genome-wide association studies for brain and behavioral traits have provided insights but also present challenges related to privacy and misuse. We discuss these ethical issues and how to mitigate potential negative consequences. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Nature Neuroscience is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Description
Abstract:Genome-wide association studies have led to the identification of robust statistical associations of genetic variants with numerous brain-related traits, including neurological and psychiatric conditions, and psychological and behavioral measures. These results may provide insight into the biology underlying these traits and may facilitate clinically useful predictions. However, these results also carry the risk of harm, including possible negative effects of inaccurate predictions, violations of privacy, stigma and genomic discrimination, raising serious ethical and legal implications. Here, we discuss ethical concerns surrounding the results of genome-wide association studies for individuals, society and researchers. Given the success of genome-wide association studies and the increasing availability of nonclinical genomic prediction technologies, better laws and guidelines are urgently needed to regulate the storage, processing and responsible use of genetic data. Also, researchers should be aware of possible misuse of their results, and we provide guidance to help avoid such negative impacts on individuals and society. Genome-wide association studies for brain and behavioral traits have provided insights but also present challenges related to privacy and misuse. We discuss these ethical issues and how to mitigate potential negative consequences. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:10976256
DOI:10.1038/s41593-023-01333-4