Evaluating training needs in clinical psychology doctoral programs.
Saved in:
| Title: | Evaluating training needs in clinical psychology doctoral programs. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Yarrington, Julia S. (AUTHOR), Montgomery, Catherine (AUTHOR), Joyner, Keanan J. (AUTHOR), O'Connor, Mary‐Frances (AUTHOR), Wolitzky‐Taylor, Kate (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Journal of Clinical Psychology. Oct2023, Vol. 79 Issue 10, p2304-2316. 13p. 2 Charts. |
| Subjects: | Clinical psychology, Training needs, Need (Psychology), Doctoral programs, Career development, Exploratory factor analysis |
| Abstract: | Objective: Advances in clinical psychology must be accompanied by advances in training. This study assessed training content, quality, and needs during clinical psychology doctoral programs among current or past doctoral students. Methods: Current or past clinical psychology doctoral students (N = 343) completed an anonymous survey assessing training experiences and needs. A descriptive‐focused exploratory factor analysis (EFA) also examined whether common subgroups of academic interests emerged. Results: Most participants reported that they sought training beyond required coursework, primarily in clinical training, cultural competency, and professional development, and reported having taken one or more unhelpful course, including discipline‐specific knowledge requirements. Descriptive results from the EFA demonstrated common training areas of interest: diversity topics, biological sciences, clinical practice, and research methods. Discussion: This study demonstrates that trainees and early career psychologists are aware of their nuanced and in some cases, unmet training needs. Conclusion: This work foregrounds the need to adapt extant training opportunities to support the next generation of clinical psychologists [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Journal of Clinical Psychology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Objective: Advances in clinical psychology must be accompanied by advances in training. This study assessed training content, quality, and needs during clinical psychology doctoral programs among current or past doctoral students. Methods: Current or past clinical psychology doctoral students (N = 343) completed an anonymous survey assessing training experiences and needs. A descriptive‐focused exploratory factor analysis (EFA) also examined whether common subgroups of academic interests emerged. Results: Most participants reported that they sought training beyond required coursework, primarily in clinical training, cultural competency, and professional development, and reported having taken one or more unhelpful course, including discipline‐specific knowledge requirements. Descriptive results from the EFA demonstrated common training areas of interest: diversity topics, biological sciences, clinical practice, and research methods. Discussion: This study demonstrates that trainees and early career psychologists are aware of their nuanced and in some cases, unmet training needs. Conclusion: This work foregrounds the need to adapt extant training opportunities to support the next generation of clinical psychologists [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 00219762 |
| DOI: | 10.1002/jclp.23549 |
