Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
First steps towards a core outcome Set for measuring aggressive behavior in prisoners: a systematic review of current methods. |
| Authors: |
Cortie, Colin H., Skinner, Jason N., Sutiyawan, Nattaporn, Matthews, Jasmine A., Lee, Annabelle, Neale, Elizabeth P., Byrne, Mitchell K., Greenberg, David, Meyer, Barbara J. |
| Source: |
Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology. Oct-Dec2023, Vol. 34 Issue 5/6, p456-501. 46p. |
| Subjects: |
Aggression (Psychology), CINAHL database, Misconduct in public office, Prisoners, Sensitivity & specificity (Statistics) |
| Geographic Terms: |
North America |
| Abstract: |
A large body of literature has examined the cause and treatment of aggressive behavior in prisons, but heterogeneity in the outcome measures used has led to difficulties comparing outcomes across studies. This systematic review aims to identify a Core Outcome Set for measuring aggression in prisons. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they measured aggressive behavior in adult male prisoners, described original research, and were in English. A systematic search of Medline, PubMed, PsycInfo, CINAHL and Cochrane databases to 7 March 2022 was conducted. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2 method. The titles and abstracts of 19,619 records were screened, with 641 reports identified for full-text examination. From these reports, 283 studies with a total of 1,402,931 prisoners were included. These studies were predominantly published from 2000 onwards, published in North America, used a cross-sectional design, and included a single method to measure aggressive behavior. The studies most commonly used self-report and official records of misconduct, with staff report and mixed methods less common. Official records of misconduct and the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire were identified as possible candidates for inclusion into a Core Outcome Set, but caveats exist around the specificity and sensitivity of these measures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
