The impact of anxiety and intolerance of uncertainty on climate change distress, policy support, and pro‐environmental behaviour.
Saved in:
| Title: | The impact of anxiety and intolerance of uncertainty on climate change distress, policy support, and pro‐environmental behaviour. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Goldwert, Danielle (AUTHOR), Dev, Amelia S. (AUTHOR), Broos, Hannah C. (AUTHOR), Broad, Kenneth (AUTHOR), Timpano, Kiara R. (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | British Journal of Clinical Psychology. Mar2024, Vol. 63 Issue 1, p1-15. 15p. |
| Subjects: | Greenhouse effect prevention, Environmental health, Fear, Psychological distress, Health policy, Climate change, Questionnaires, Uncertainty, Descriptive statistics, Surveys, Health behavior, Sociodemographic factors, Political participation, Video recording, Cognition |
| Geographic Terms: | Florida |
| Abstract: | Objectives: As the threat of climate change continues to grow, bolstering individual‐level support for climate change initiatives is crucial. More research is needed to better understand how individual difference factors, such as climate change anxiety and intolerance of uncertainty (IU), may shape how people perceive climate change and respond to climate change messaging. To date, the majority of published studies have not taken these individual difference factors into consideration, and IU has been particularly neglected in the climate change literature. This study examined the independent effects of climate change anxiety and IU on three climate change‐related outcomes: climate‐related distress, support for climate change policies, and behavioural engagement. Methods: Participants were Florida residents (N = 441) who completed an online survey, including measures of climate change anxiety and IU. Participants then watched a video describing climate change consequences and completed three outcome measures: post‐video distress, climate change policy support, and behavioural engagement. Results: Controlling for demographic covariates, both climate change anxiety (β =.43, p <.001) and IU (β =.27, p <.001) were associated with greater post‐video distress, but only IU independently predicted greater policy support (β =.10, p =.034) and behavioural engagement (β =.12, p =.017). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that IU may be an important factor in promoting pro‐environmental behaviour and policy support, but climate change anxiety may increase emotional distress without boosting meaningful behaviours or support. Our findings highlight the potential influence of cognitive factors on climate change engagement and suggest that invoking uncertainty rather than anxiety may be more effective in catalysing effective environmental engagement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of British Journal of Clinical Psychology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Objectives: As the threat of climate change continues to grow, bolstering individual‐level support for climate change initiatives is crucial. More research is needed to better understand how individual difference factors, such as climate change anxiety and intolerance of uncertainty (IU), may shape how people perceive climate change and respond to climate change messaging. To date, the majority of published studies have not taken these individual difference factors into consideration, and IU has been particularly neglected in the climate change literature. This study examined the independent effects of climate change anxiety and IU on three climate change‐related outcomes: climate‐related distress, support for climate change policies, and behavioural engagement. Methods: Participants were Florida residents (N = 441) who completed an online survey, including measures of climate change anxiety and IU. Participants then watched a video describing climate change consequences and completed three outcome measures: post‐video distress, climate change policy support, and behavioural engagement. Results: Controlling for demographic covariates, both climate change anxiety (β =.43, p <.001) and IU (β =.27, p <.001) were associated with greater post‐video distress, but only IU independently predicted greater policy support (β =.10, p =.034) and behavioural engagement (β =.12, p =.017). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that IU may be an important factor in promoting pro‐environmental behaviour and policy support, but climate change anxiety may increase emotional distress without boosting meaningful behaviours or support. Our findings highlight the potential influence of cognitive factors on climate change engagement and suggest that invoking uncertainty rather than anxiety may be more effective in catalysing effective environmental engagement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 01446657 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/bjc.12441 |
