Comparative study of two Japanese rhinoconjunctivitis quality-of-life questionnaires.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Comparative study of two Japanese rhinoconjunctivitis quality-of-life questionnaires.
Authors: Okuda, M. (AUTHOR), Ohkubo, K. (AUTHOR), Goto, M. (AUTHOR), Okamoto, H. (AUTHOR), Konno, A. (AUTHOR), Baba, K. (AUTHOR), Ogino, S. (AUTHOR), Enomoto, M. (AUTHOR), Imai, T. (AUTHOR), So, N. (AUTHOR), Ishikawa, Y. (AUTHOR), Takenaka, Y. (AUTHOR), Manndai, T. (AUTHOR), Crawford, B. (AUTHOR)
Source: Acta Oto-Laryngologica. Jul2005, Vol. 125 Issue 7, p736-744. 9p.
Subjects: Conjunctivitis, Conjunctiva diseases, Eye inflammation, Quality of life, Questionnaires, Surveys
Abstract: Conclusion . Two questionnaires were used to assess quality of life (QOL) in allergic rhinitis: the Japanese translation of the Rhino-conjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQJ) and an original Japanese QOL questionnaire (JRQLQ). Either questionnaire may be used to assess QOL depending on differences in target domains. Objectives . Although pollinosis is a common disease which has a major impact on patient QOL, no internationally standardized questionnaire has been available in Japan until now. The aim of this study was to compare two currently available QOL questionnaires for allergic rhinitis in Japan—the RQLQJ and JRQLQ—in terms of their appropriateness for clinical use and their psychometric properties. Material and methods . A multicenter, inter-group, cross-sectional study was conducted in 187 adult symptomatic patients with Japanese cedar pollinosis in 2003. Patient scores on the two questionnaires were compared in terms of both overall and comparable domains. We also examined the acceptability, construct and reliability of both questionnaires. Results . The questionnaires were highly correlated in terms of both overall and comparable domain scores. In addition, both questionnaires had equal and satisfactory psychometric validity, demonstrating that they are both useful tools for assessing QOL in rhinitis. However, when compared with each other, the JRQLQ focuses mainly on activities of daily life and is simpler, while the RQLQJ focuses mainly on rhinitis-related health and is more responsive. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Acta Oto-Laryngologica is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:Conclusion . Two questionnaires were used to assess quality of life (QOL) in allergic rhinitis: the Japanese translation of the Rhino-conjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQJ) and an original Japanese QOL questionnaire (JRQLQ). Either questionnaire may be used to assess QOL depending on differences in target domains. Objectives . Although pollinosis is a common disease which has a major impact on patient QOL, no internationally standardized questionnaire has been available in Japan until now. The aim of this study was to compare two currently available QOL questionnaires for allergic rhinitis in Japan—the RQLQJ and JRQLQ—in terms of their appropriateness for clinical use and their psychometric properties. Material and methods . A multicenter, inter-group, cross-sectional study was conducted in 187 adult symptomatic patients with Japanese cedar pollinosis in 2003. Patient scores on the two questionnaires were compared in terms of both overall and comparable domains. We also examined the acceptability, construct and reliability of both questionnaires. Results . The questionnaires were highly correlated in terms of both overall and comparable domain scores. In addition, both questionnaires had equal and satisfactory psychometric validity, demonstrating that they are both useful tools for assessing QOL in rhinitis. However, when compared with each other, the JRQLQ focuses mainly on activities of daily life and is simpler, while the RQLQJ focuses mainly on rhinitis-related health and is more responsive. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:00016489
DOI:10.1080/00016480510026944