Examining cognitive disengagement syndrome in a psychiatric outpatient sample: Psychometric support and associations with internalizing symptoms and sleep problems.
Saved in:
| Title: | Examining cognitive disengagement syndrome in a psychiatric outpatient sample: Psychometric support and associations with internalizing symptoms and sleep problems. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Yucens, Bengu (AUTHOR), Basay, Omer (AUTHOR), Buber, Ahmet (AUTHOR), Tumkaya, Selim (AUTHOR), Kabukcu Basay, Burge (AUTHOR), Erdem, Busra (AUTHOR), Becker, Stephen P. (AUTHOR), Leonard Burns, G. (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Journal of Clinical Psychology. Jul2024, Vol. 80 Issue 7, p1515-1527. 13p. |
| Subjects: | Sleep, Internalizing behavior, Psychometrics, Teacher evaluation, Psychiatric clinics, Continuous performance test, Compulsive eating |
| Geographic Terms: | Turkey |
| Abstract: | Objective: The internal (structural) and external validity of a self‐report measure of cognitive disengagement syndrome (CDS, formerly sluggish cognitive tempo) relative to a self‐report measure of attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder‐inattention (ADHD‐IN) was evaluated with adults from university outpatient psychiatric clinics in Turkey. Methods: A total of 274 outpatients (75.9% women; ages 18–64 years; Mage = 31.06; SDage = 10.84; 50.4% anxiety disorders; 41.6% depressive disorders; 2.9% ADHD; 1.5% sleep disorders; 0.7% eating disorders; 2.9% no mental disorder) completed self‐report measures of CDS, ADHD‐IN, ADHD‐hyperactivity/impulsivity (HI), sleep problems, depression, and stress. Results: All 15 CDS symptoms measured by the Adult Concentration Inventory (ACI) showed convergent (moderate to high loadings on the CDS factor) and discriminant (loading close to zero on the ADHD‐IN factor) validity. CDS also showed stronger first‐order and unique associations than ADHD‐IN with sleep problems, depression, anxiety, and stress, whereas ADHD‐IN showed stronger first‐order and unique associations than CDS with ADHD‐HI. Conclusion: This is the first study to provide support for the scores from this 15 item self‐report measure of CDS by the ACI in a clinical sample of adults, with findings consistent with previous studies examining parent and teacher rating scale measures with the same 15 CDS symptoms. These findings provide additional support for usefulness of these 15 CDS symptoms as measured by the ACI to study CDS across various cultures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Journal of Clinical Psychology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Objective: The internal (structural) and external validity of a self‐report measure of cognitive disengagement syndrome (CDS, formerly sluggish cognitive tempo) relative to a self‐report measure of attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder‐inattention (ADHD‐IN) was evaluated with adults from university outpatient psychiatric clinics in Turkey. Methods: A total of 274 outpatients (75.9% women; ages 18–64 years; Mage = 31.06; SDage = 10.84; 50.4% anxiety disorders; 41.6% depressive disorders; 2.9% ADHD; 1.5% sleep disorders; 0.7% eating disorders; 2.9% no mental disorder) completed self‐report measures of CDS, ADHD‐IN, ADHD‐hyperactivity/impulsivity (HI), sleep problems, depression, and stress. Results: All 15 CDS symptoms measured by the Adult Concentration Inventory (ACI) showed convergent (moderate to high loadings on the CDS factor) and discriminant (loading close to zero on the ADHD‐IN factor) validity. CDS also showed stronger first‐order and unique associations than ADHD‐IN with sleep problems, depression, anxiety, and stress, whereas ADHD‐IN showed stronger first‐order and unique associations than CDS with ADHD‐HI. Conclusion: This is the first study to provide support for the scores from this 15 item self‐report measure of CDS by the ACI in a clinical sample of adults, with findings consistent with previous studies examining parent and teacher rating scale measures with the same 15 CDS symptoms. These findings provide additional support for usefulness of these 15 CDS symptoms as measured by the ACI to study CDS across various cultures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 00219762 |
| DOI: | 10.1002/jclp.23678 |
