View in EDS

Describing High School Stakeholders' Preferences for a Return‐to‐School Framework Following Concussion.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Describing High School Stakeholders' Preferences for a Return‐to‐School Framework Following Concussion.
Authors: Shepherd, Heather A., Heming, Emily, Reed, Nick, Caron, Jeffrey G., Yeates, Keith O., Emery, Carolyn A.
Source: Journal of School Health. Jul2024, Vol. 94 Issue 7, p638-646. 9p.
Subjects: Re-entry students, Parents, Qualitative research, Academic accommodations, High school students, Interviewing, Content analysis, Health policy, Parent attitudes, Descriptive statistics, Thematic analysis, Sound recordings, Teachers, College teacher attitudes, Conceptual structures, Research methodology, Communication, Convalescence, Stakeholder analysis, Student attitudes, Health education, Social support, Data analysis software, Family support, Brain concussion, School health services
Geographic Terms: Alberta
Abstract: Background: Return to school supports are recommended to facilitate adolescents' re‐entry to school following a concussion. However, little is known as to what school stakeholders prefer for a return‐to‐school process. This study sought to describe the preferences of high school students, parents, and educators for a Return‐to‐School Framework for adolescents following a concussion. Methods: We conducted qualitative semi‐structured, 1‐on‐1 or group interviews with high school students (n = 6), parents (n = 5), and educators (n = 15) from Calgary, Canada. Interviews aimed to describe participants' preferences for a Return‐to‐School Framework for students following a concussion. Interviews were analyzed using conventional content analysis. Results: We organized the data into 4 main themes: (1) purpose of the Return‐to‐School Framework; (2) format and operation of the Return‐to‐School Framework; (3) communication about a student's concussion; and (4) necessity of concussion education for students and educators. Implications for School Health Policy, Practice, and Equity: A Return‐to‐School Framework following concussion should be developed in consultation with families, educators, and students and supports should be tailored to each student. Conclusions: Participants preferred a standardized and consistent Return‐to‐School Framework including ongoing communication between stakeholders as well as feasible and individualized school supports. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of School Health is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: pbh
DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
An: 177818667
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Describing High School Stakeholders' Preferences for a Return‐to‐School Framework Following Concussion.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Shepherd%2C+Heather+A%2E%22">Shepherd, Heather A.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Heming%2C+Emily%22">Heming, Emily</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Reed%2C+Nick%22">Reed, Nick</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Caron%2C+Jeffrey+G%2E%22">Caron, Jeffrey G.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Yeates%2C+Keith+O%2E%22">Yeates, Keith O.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Emery%2C+Carolyn+A%2E%22">Emery, Carolyn A.</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+School+Health%22">Journal of School Health</searchLink>. Jul2024, Vol. 94 Issue 7, p638-646. 9p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Re-entry+students%22">Re-entry students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Parents%22">Parents</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Qualitative+research%22">Qualitative research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+accommodations%22">Academic accommodations</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22High+school+students%22">High school students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interviewing%22">Interviewing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Content+analysis%22">Content analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+policy%22">Health policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Parent+attitudes%22">Parent attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Descriptive+statistics%22">Descriptive statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Thematic+analysis%22">Thematic analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sound+recordings%22">Sound recordings</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teachers%22">Teachers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+teacher+attitudes%22">College teacher attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Conceptual+structures%22">Conceptual structures</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+methodology%22">Research methodology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Communication%22">Communication</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Convalescence%22">Convalescence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Stakeholder+analysis%22">Stakeholder analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+attitudes%22">Student attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+education%22">Health education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+support%22">Social support</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+analysis+software%22">Data analysis software</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Family+support%22">Family support</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Brain+concussion%22">Brain concussion</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22School+health+services%22">School health services</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectGeographic
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Alberta%22">Alberta</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Background: Return to school supports are recommended to facilitate adolescents' re‐entry to school following a concussion. However, little is known as to what school stakeholders prefer for a return‐to‐school process. This study sought to describe the preferences of high school students, parents, and educators for a Return‐to‐School Framework for adolescents following a concussion. Methods: We conducted qualitative semi‐structured, 1‐on‐1 or group interviews with high school students (n = 6), parents (n = 5), and educators (n = 15) from Calgary, Canada. Interviews aimed to describe participants' preferences for a Return‐to‐School Framework for students following a concussion. Interviews were analyzed using conventional content analysis. Results: We organized the data into 4 main themes: (1) purpose of the Return‐to‐School Framework; (2) format and operation of the Return‐to‐School Framework; (3) communication about a student's concussion; and (4) necessity of concussion education for students and educators. Implications for School Health Policy, Practice, and Equity: A Return‐to‐School Framework following concussion should be developed in consultation with families, educators, and students and supports should be tailored to each student. Conclusions: Participants preferred a standardized and consistent Return‐to‐School Framework including ongoing communication between stakeholders as well as feasible and individualized school supports. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of School Health is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=177818667
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1111/josh.13434
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 9
        StartPage: 638
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Re-entry students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Parents
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Qualitative research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Academic accommodations
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: High school students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Interviewing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Content analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Health policy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Parent attitudes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Thematic analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Sound recordings
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Teachers
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: College teacher attitudes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Conceptual structures
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research methodology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Communication
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Convalescence
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Stakeholder analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Student attitudes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Health education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Social support
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Data analysis software
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Family support
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Brain concussion
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: School health services
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Alberta
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Describing High School Stakeholders' Preferences for a Return‐to‐School Framework Following Concussion.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Shepherd, Heather A.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Heming, Emily
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Reed, Nick
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Caron, Jeffrey G.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Yeates, Keith O.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Emery, Carolyn A.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 07
              Text: Jul2024
              Type: published
              Y: 2024
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00224391
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 94
            – Type: issue
              Value: 7
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of School Health
              Type: main
ResultId 1