View in EDS

Treatment patterns and oncological outcomes of older adults with metastatic prostate cancer in real‐world setting.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Treatment patterns and oncological outcomes of older adults with metastatic prostate cancer in real‐world setting.
Authors: Wenzel, Mike, Hoeh, Benedikt, Wagner, Nele, Koll, Florestan, Siech, Carolin, Humke, Clara, Steuber, Thomas, Graefen, Markus, Tilki, Derya, Kluth, Luis, Traumann, Miriam, Banek, Séverine, Chun, Felix K. H., Mandel, Philipp
Source: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. Sep2024, Vol. 72 Issue 9, p2700-2708. 9p.
Subjects: Antineoplastic agents, Docetaxel, Academic medical centers, T-test (Statistics), Kruskal-Wallis Test, Life expectancy, Prostate tumors, Treatment effectiveness, Retrospective studies, Descriptive statistics, Chi-squared test, Multivariate analysis, Metastasis, Kaplan-Meier estimator, Cancer chemotherapy, Androgen receptors, Overall survival, Proportional hazards models, Regression analysis, Old age
Geographic Terms: Germany
Abstract: Background: The landscape of systemic therapies for metastatic hormone‐sensitive (mHSPC) and castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) extensively improved within the last decades resulting in a significantly prolonged overall survival. However, subgroup analyses of phase III trials suggest potentially different overall survival outcomes for older adults. Methods: We relied on our institutional metastatic prostate cancer database to identify mHSPC and subsequently mCRPC patients. Older adults were stratified according to age groups 70–74 versus ≥75–79 versus ≥80 years at metastatic occurrence. Subsequently, uni‐ and multivariable time to mCRPC and overall survival analyses were performed. Results: Of 494 older adults, 217 (44%) were 70–74 versus 180 (36%) 75–79 versus 97 (20%) ≥80 years old. Rates of local prostate cancer treatment differed significantly between all three groups (p < 0.01). Regarding mHSPC treatment, androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSI) were administered in 30–39% of patients and docetaxel with 9% in age group 70–74 years and 6% and 3% in age groups 75–79 years and ≥80 years. Regarding mCRPC treatment, significant differences between treatment proportions were observed (p < 0.01). Most common treatment was ARSI for all three groups. Conversely, chemotherapy was more frequently administered in patients aged 70–74 (16%), relative to 4% and 3% in 75‐79 year and ≥80 year aged patients. In univariable and multivariable time to mCRPC analyses, overall survival in mHSPC and OS in mCRPC analyses, no significant differences between all three age groups were observed (all p ≥ 0.3). Conclusions: Treatment patterns differ significantly between older adults with metastatic prostate cancer. However, these differences may not result in differences of overall life expectancy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of the American Geriatrics Society is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Description
Abstract:Background: The landscape of systemic therapies for metastatic hormone‐sensitive (mHSPC) and castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) extensively improved within the last decades resulting in a significantly prolonged overall survival. However, subgroup analyses of phase III trials suggest potentially different overall survival outcomes for older adults. Methods: We relied on our institutional metastatic prostate cancer database to identify mHSPC and subsequently mCRPC patients. Older adults were stratified according to age groups 70–74 versus ≥75–79 versus ≥80 years at metastatic occurrence. Subsequently, uni‐ and multivariable time to mCRPC and overall survival analyses were performed. Results: Of 494 older adults, 217 (44%) were 70–74 versus 180 (36%) 75–79 versus 97 (20%) ≥80 years old. Rates of local prostate cancer treatment differed significantly between all three groups (p < 0.01). Regarding mHSPC treatment, androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSI) were administered in 30–39% of patients and docetaxel with 9% in age group 70–74 years and 6% and 3% in age groups 75–79 years and ≥80 years. Regarding mCRPC treatment, significant differences between treatment proportions were observed (p < 0.01). Most common treatment was ARSI for all three groups. Conversely, chemotherapy was more frequently administered in patients aged 70–74 (16%), relative to 4% and 3% in 75‐79 year and ≥80 year aged patients. In univariable and multivariable time to mCRPC analyses, overall survival in mHSPC and OS in mCRPC analyses, no significant differences between all three age groups were observed (all p ≥ 0.3). Conclusions: Treatment patterns differ significantly between older adults with metastatic prostate cancer. However, these differences may not result in differences of overall life expectancy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:00028614
DOI:10.1111/jgs.19045