Comparison of different telerehabilitation protocols for urogenital symptoms in females with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial.
Saved in:
| Title: | Comparison of different telerehabilitation protocols for urogenital symptoms in females with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Deodato, Manuela (AUTHOR), Fornasaro, Mia (AUTHOR), Martini, Miriam (AUTHOR), Zelesnich, Francesca (AUTHOR), Sartori, Arianna (AUTHOR), Galmonte, Alessandra (AUTHOR), Buoite Stella, Alex (AUTHOR), Manganotti, Paolo (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Neurological Sciences. Nov2024, Vol. 45 Issue 11, p5501-5509. 9p. |
| Subjects: | Medical rehabilitation, Pelvic floor, Beck Depression Inventory, Telerehabilitation, Randomized controlled trials |
| Abstract: | Telerehabilitation has been suggested to be equally effective than in-person rehabilitation, and could be helpful to increase participation and reduce barriers. People with multiple sclerosis (MS) often present urogenital dysfunctions, impairing independence and quality of life (QoL). Since the different available telerehabilitation protocols, the present study aimed to compare a live video urogenital rehabilitation intervention protocol (REMOTE) with a home-based pre-recorded video protocol (SELF). A randomized-controlled trial was performed, with 14 females with MS being allocated in the REMOTE group (36 ± 9 y) and 14 females in the SELF group (37 ± 7 y). Both telerehabilitation protocols were identical in terms of contents (including pelvic floor training and relaxation exercises), frequency and duration, consisting of 10 sessions of 45 min each, every 5 days. Questionnaires were administered at the beginning and the end of the study: Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ) symptoms and related QoL, the main outcome being ICIQ incontinence score. Despite most of the outcomes improved in both groups, REMOTE was found to be more effective than SELF in most of the SF-36 domains (from p < 0.001 pη2 0.555 to p = 0.044 pη2 0.147), FSFI (p = 0.001 pη2 0.373), ICIQ (p = 0.003 pη2 0.291). Despite the home-based pre-recorded videos could be effective in improving urogenital symptoms, live video urogenital rehabilitation results in larger improvements. Telerehabilitation should be encouraged for urogenital dysfunctions in females with MS, and pre-recorded videos could represent an alternative when live sessions are not available. Clinical trial registration This randomized controlled trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with the number NCT05984095. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Neurological Sciences is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Telerehabilitation has been suggested to be equally effective than in-person rehabilitation, and could be helpful to increase participation and reduce barriers. People with multiple sclerosis (MS) often present urogenital dysfunctions, impairing independence and quality of life (QoL). Since the different available telerehabilitation protocols, the present study aimed to compare a live video urogenital rehabilitation intervention protocol (REMOTE) with a home-based pre-recorded video protocol (SELF). A randomized-controlled trial was performed, with 14 females with MS being allocated in the REMOTE group (36 ± 9 y) and 14 females in the SELF group (37 ± 7 y). Both telerehabilitation protocols were identical in terms of contents (including pelvic floor training and relaxation exercises), frequency and duration, consisting of 10 sessions of 45 min each, every 5 days. Questionnaires were administered at the beginning and the end of the study: Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ) symptoms and related QoL, the main outcome being ICIQ incontinence score. Despite most of the outcomes improved in both groups, REMOTE was found to be more effective than SELF in most of the SF-36 domains (from p < 0.001 pη2 0.555 to p = 0.044 pη2 0.147), FSFI (p = 0.001 pη2 0.373), ICIQ (p = 0.003 pη2 0.291). Despite the home-based pre-recorded videos could be effective in improving urogenital symptoms, live video urogenital rehabilitation results in larger improvements. Telerehabilitation should be encouraged for urogenital dysfunctions in females with MS, and pre-recorded videos could represent an alternative when live sessions are not available. Clinical trial registration This randomized controlled trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with the number NCT05984095. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 15901874 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s10072-024-07742-y |
